Spherical Harmonic Wave Function =? 3D Wave Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the spherical harmonic wave function, expressed as (1/r)e^(i(kr-ωt)), satisfies the three-dimensional wave equation. Participants suggest using spherical coordinates for simplification and emphasize the need to convert Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) into polar coordinates. There is confusion regarding the treatment of the imaginary part of the wave function and the correct application of the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. The conversation highlights the importance of consulting textbooks or online resources for the proper formulation of the Laplacian in this context. Overall, the aim is to establish the wave function's validity as a solution to the wave equation.
drumercalzone
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that the spherical harmonic wave function \frac{1}{r}e^{i(kr-{\omega}t)} is a solution of the three-dimensional wave equation, where r = (x^2+y^2+z^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}. The proof is easier if spherical coordinates are used.

Homework Equations



Wave function: \frac{{\partial}^2U}{\partial x^2} + \frac{{\partial}^2U}{\partial y^2} + \frac{{\partial}^2U}{\partial z^2} = \frac{1}{u^2} \frac{{\partial}^2U}{\partial t^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I really just don't even know where to start. Do I first convert the x,y,z into polar coordinates? or do I just substitue what's above in for r? But then what's up with imaginary part?
 
  • Like
Likes asmaa ebrahem
Physics news on Phys.org
You wrote the wave equation using Cartesian coordinates. More generally, you can write it as\nabla^2 U = \frac{1}{u^2}\frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial t^2}
In your textbook, you can probably find how to write the Laplacian \nabla^2 using spherical coordinates. (Or just Google it.)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top