Ionisation by a magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for a powerful magnetic field to overcome the binding energy of electrons in atoms, possibly leading to ionization. Participants clarify that while magnetic fields can influence atomic structure, they do not ionize atoms on their own, unlike electric fields. The feasibility of generating such strong magnetic fields with current technology is questioned, with references to the energy requirements for practical applications. The Paschen-Back effect and its implications for isotope separation are mentioned as related concepts. Overall, the consensus is that while theoretically possible, the practical application of magnetic fields for ionization remains limited.
Kael42
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Is it not possible that, given a powerful enough magnetic field, the binding energy of an electron in a stable, neutral atom could be overcome from the tearing of the negatively charged electrons in one direction, and of the positively charged nucleus in the other?

I have searched online, and there doesn't seem to be a mention to this anywhere...

If this were to be true, I imagine that it would have been used already to form otherwise unobtainable negative ions, and make brand new compounds. Such a revolution has obviously not happened, so what is the problem with my logic?

If the problem is that it requires too strong a magnetic field to be produced by human technology, how could the theoretical power required be calculated.

Cheers, Kael.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kael42 said:
so what is the problem with my logic?

Do you understand what a magnetic field is and how charged particles are affected by them?
 
I was fair sure I did, but it has been a while since I dealt with them, and your question seems to imply I don't. I'll google them to refresh my memory.
 
Took a look. Nothing seems to contradict the logic I found. Positive and negative particles are pulled in circles in opposing directions. In the case of an atom, It would simply be a fight between the pull of the field and and the binding energy of the electrons... wouldn't it?
 
No. Electric fields pull electrons and nucleii apart, and you can field-ionize atoms this way with sufficiently strong electric fields. What this has to do with "otherwise unobtainable negative ions", I do not have the slightest clue, but magnetic fields are not electric fields - they can change atomic structure and affect emission and absorption spectra, but they do not by themselves ionize atoms.
 
I'm a bit late here, but I think an enormously strong magnetic field could indeed ionize some atoms. The problem is that as far as I know the ones we obtain in the lab (see there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(magnetic_field )) are too small or they seem to blow up material.
I think we can use the formula \Delta E =m_l \mu _B B (although I am not 100% sure, maybe this formula instead : \Delta E =(m_l+2m_s) \mu _B B. Can someone tell me which one to use for a huge magnetic field?). For example we can take m_l=1.
In any case I suggest you to read about the Paschen-Back effect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I remember watching this episode about the manhatten project where they used magnets in isotope separation to help purify uranium.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope_separation

This required an large amount of energy. I think its safe to say your system would require quite a bit more.
 
Hey guys, I was wondering if anyone could expound on this question, even though it's old, I wanted to add into the question here on whether a magnetic field could be strong enough to propel the atoms into collision with some ferromagnetic element such as Iron.
 
Back
Top