Meaning of area under a acceleration vs mass curve

AI Thread Summary
In a graph of acceleration versus mass for a constant force with variable mass, the area under the curve does not represent the force itself. Instead, it corresponds to the integral of the function, specifically \int {\frac{F}{m}dm}. To determine the constant force from the graph, one must understand that the area does not equate to force directly. The correct interpretation of the area under the curve involves calculus, emphasizing that it represents the integral rather than a simple multiplication of variables. Therefore, the area under the acceleration vs. mass curve is not indicative of the force applied.
brosaba
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I graph acceleration vs mass for constant force but variable mass experiment, shouldn't the area under the curve be the force? How do i determine the constant force from the graph?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The area under the curve is not the force. The area equals the integral \int {\frac{F}{m}dm}.

In general when you make a graph of a function f(x) vs x then the area under the curve is NOT xf(x) it is rather the integral \int f(x)dx
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top