Angular Momentum Eigenvalues/Significance of QN l

"pi"mp
Messages
129
Reaction score
1
Angular Momentum Eigenvalues/Significance of QN "l"

So I am doing a research project in the mathematics department involving looking at the "p-norms" of the Spherical Harmonics. This gets messy pretty quick and involves some dense analysis and asymptotics.

My Professor suggested we will be most interested in the cases where "l" is very, very large and m is either plus or minus l.

So I'm tackling the mathematics as we speak but I just have a few physics questions:

1.) What is the physical significance of a "large l" value? And what about m=l or m=-l?

2.) I've heard that these p-norms give us the "concentrations" of the spherical harmonics. What exactly does this mean and what consequence could this have physically?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.)The physical significance of a large "l" value is that it represents the angular momentum quantum number. The larger "l" is, the more angular momentum the system has. When m=l or m=-l, it means that the angular momentum is aligned along one of the axes, and thus has maximum angular momentum. 2.)The p-norms give us information about the amount of energy contained in different spherical harmonics. This is important because it tells us how much angular momentum a system has, which can have implications for its stability and behavior.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top