Question about charge without charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter skippy1729
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
skippy1729
Question about "charge without charge"

"Charge without charge" = electric field trapped in wormholes.

I have found this concept fascinating for many decades. I have read in many places (popular and scholarly articles) that it is an unsuitable model for a classically charged body since the wormhole will "pinch off" or otherwise become singular. I would really like to see an analytical proof of this. Does anyone have a reference?

Skippy

PS A free online reference would be preferred, but I will take anything. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think this paper might answer my question:

Phys. Rev. 128, 919–929 (1962)
Causality and Multiply Connected Space-Time

Robert W. Fuller*
Pupin Physical Laboratories, Columbia University, New York, New York

John A. Wheeler†
Palmer Physical Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Received 16 May 1962; published in the issue dated October 1962

With the introduction of multiply connected topologies into physics, a question of causality arises. There are alternative routes between two points in a multiply connected space. Therefore, one may ask if a signal traveling at the speed of light along one route could be outpaced by a signal which has traveled a much shorter path through a handle or "wormhole." This paper examines one such situation and shows that in this example causality is preserved. It proves essential in the analysis to distinguish between those regions of space-time which are catastrophic and those which are not. A catastrophic region is composed of catastrophic points. A catastrophic point in space-time is so located with respect to eventual singularities in the intrinsic geometry that every time-like geodesic through it necessarily runs into a region of infinite curvature at some time in the future—or was born out of a region of infinite curvature at some time in the past—or both. If a classical analysis of nature were possible—which it is not—then it would be natural to postulate that laboratory physics is carried out in noncatastrophic regions of space-time. Two such regions are shown to exist in the example considered in the paper. It is shown that no signal can ever be sent from one to the other. The key point in preventing any violation of causality is simple: The (Schwarzschild) throat of the wormhole pinches off in a finite time and traps the signal in a region of infinite curvature. This investigation also displays some of the unusual geometric features of the Schwarzschild solution of Einstein's equations for a spherically symmetrical center of attraction. Radial spacelike geodesics passing through the throat are calculated and it is shown that there exist regions of space-time unreachable by any radial geodesics that issue from a given point. Also, there exist points in space-time from which light signals can never be received no matter how long one waits.

Anyone know of any free copies of this lurking on the internet?

Skippy
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top