What's it called when a 3D shape can be made of 2D surfaces of all the same size

keysle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What's it called when a 3D shape can be made of 2D surfaces of all the same shape and dimensions?

To make a cube, I can use 6 4-sided-squares (of course they're 4 sided)
To make a pyramid (3 sided), I can use 4 3-sided-triangles

I can do this with pentagon as well (i don't know what the shape is called)

Eventually I can't do this as the sides of the shape increase because the remaining angle.


... after some thinking I realized I can only do this with 3 equilateral shapes.
3 sided
4 sided
and 5 sided

MRtiO.png


Once I get to the hexagon ... well

r6zJy.png




Now here's an even more interesting question: Are there any others shapes convex or concave equilateral or not that can be used to create a 3D shape? (where the base shapes remains the same)
If so how can one determine if a shape is capable of doing this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Regular polyhedron
 
Thanks!

Doesn't look like there are too many of those shapes.

Do you know about the second questions?
Now here's an even more interesting question: Are there any others shapes convex or concave equilateral or not that can be used to create a 3D shape? (where the base shapes remains the same)
If so how can one determine if a shape is capable of doing this?
 
keysle said:
What's it called when a 3D shape can be made of 2D surfaces of all the same shape and dimensions?

To make a cube, I can use 6 4-sided-squares (of course they're 4 sided)
To make a pyramid (3 sided), I can use 4 3-sided-triangles

I can do this with pentagon as well (i don't know what the shape is called)

Eventually I can't do this as the sides of the shape increase because the remaining angle.


... after some thinking I realized I can only do this with 3 equilateral shapes.
3 sided
4 sided
and 5 sided

MRtiO.png


Once I get to the hexagon ... well

r6zJy.png




Now here's an even more interesting question: Are there any others shapes convex or concave equilateral or not that can be used to create a 3D shape? (where the base shapes remains the same)
If so how can one determine if a shape is capable of doing this?

You can use the Euler Formula to prove, if I remember correctly, there are only five which are all regular polygons. 4,6,8,12,20
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top