Circuit Analysis for Power Transmission Network Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of lossless networks in power transmission and the mathematical representation of power flow using complex numbers. Participants explore definitions, mathematical reasoning, and the implications of using complex conjugates in power calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define a lossless network as one that contains no resistances, implying no real energy loss, with reactances only storing and releasing energy.
  • There is a discussion on the use of the complex conjugate of the current in power calculations, with some participants explaining it relates to obtaining the correct phasor angle for power.
  • Participants present the mathematical representation of voltage and current in phasor form and discuss the implications of multiplying these terms.
  • One participant questions the necessity of using the angle of the power factor instead of the angle of power itself, seeking clarification on the distinction.
  • Another participant elaborates on the expansion of the product of voltage and the complex conjugate of current, relating it to real and reactive power.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of lossless networks and the role of complex conjugates in power calculations, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the need for the angle of the power factor versus the angle of power itself. The discussion reflects multiple viewpoints and clarifications without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of terms like "power factor" and the conditions under which the network is considered lossless may not be fully articulated, leading to potential misunderstandings. The mathematical steps involved in the power calculations are also not fully resolved.

Constantinos
Messages
80
Reaction score
1
Hey!

Below you will find a piece of text I found on a paper. There are some things I don't get, perhaps you could help me.

What it means for the network to be lossless?
Also, why is the power flow equal to Re[Vi(t) Ii,k(t)*] and not outright Vi(t)*Ii,k(t) ? Why the complex conjugate?

I get the math, but not the definitions really!

attachment.php?attachmentid=46400&stc=1&d=1334832268.jpg

 

Attachments

  • Image.jpg
    Image.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 530
Physics news on Phys.org
A lossless network contains no resistances, so no real energy can be lost by that network (remember that reactances only store and release energy without loss).

The complex conjugate of the current is used in order to get the phosor angle correct for the power. It has to do with how phasors are multiplied.

Suppose:
##V = |V| \angle \phi_v##
##I = |I| \angle \phi_i ##

Multiplying:
##V I = |V||I| \angle \phi_v + \phi_i##

However, for the power we should have the angle corresponding to the power factor:

##\phi_v - \phi_i = \phi~~~~##

So we need to invert the sign of the current angle, hence the complex conjugate is taken.
 
gneill said:
A lossless network contains no resistances, so no real energy can be lost by that network (remember that reactances only store and release energy without loss).

Ah yes I see, having susceptance means it also has reactance (I forgot about that).

gneill said:
The complex conjugate of the current is used in order to get the phosor angle correct for the power. It has to do with how phasors are multiplied.

Suppose:
##V = |V| \angle \phi_v##
##I = |I| \angle \phi_i ##

Multiplying:
##V I = |V||I| \angle \phi_v + \phi_i##

However, for the power we should have the angle corresponding to the power factor:

##\phi_v - \phi_i = \phi~~~~##

So we need to invert the sign of the current angle, hence the complex conjugate is taken.

I'm not sure I understand. Why would we need the angle of the power factor and not the angle of power itself? By power factor I assume you mean this correct?
 
Constantinos said:
I'm not sure I understand. Why would we need the angle of the power factor and not the angle of power itself? By power factor I assume you mean this correct?

If you expand VI* then:

##V I^* = |V||I| \angle \phi = |V||I| cos(\phi) + j|V||I| sin(\phi)##

But this is just the sum of the real and imaginary power P + jQ.

##VI^* = P + jQ##
 
Yes I think I get it now, thanks for the clarifications!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K