Compute ΔB seen by a magnetometer flown on a satellite

AI Thread Summary
A sample calculation discusses how a satellite magnetometer at 300 km altitude detects magnetic field changes (ΔB) from a current flowing at 100 km with a density of 150 μA/m² over a 5 km² area. The Biot-Savart Law is suggested as the appropriate formula for calculating ΔB, though the original poster initially attempted a scalar form due to confusion about the problem's requirements. Feedback indicates that a vector approach is necessary, emphasizing the importance of geometry in the calculations. The poster's initial calculation yielded ΔB = 1.110 pT, but further clarification on using vector forms is needed for accuracy. The discussion highlights the complexities of magnetic field calculations in satellite applications.
harlowz2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Sample calculation - If a satellite carrying a magnetometer flies at 300km over a current that is flowing at 100km w/ a magnitude of 150 μA/m2 (over a cross-section of ~5 km2), how big a ΔB will be seen by the magnetometer?
Assumptions (based on my understanding):
-Satellite altitude remains constant
-Current altitude and magnitude remains constant
-Speed of the satellite does not matter

Knowns:
Current density (Amps/m2) = J = 150
Distance between magnetometer and current = r = 200 km
Current area = Area = 5 km2



2. I have very limited experience with magnetic field calculations, but I believe the equation that should be used is as follows (note: instructor did not provide any equation):
A form of the Biot-Savart Law ⇔ B= (μ0/4\pi) * \int(J x r)/r2 d\upsilon



3. I do not have an attempt at a solution, since I have no idea where to start. Please help!

UPDATE: Here is what I have tried so far, and the units appear to check out.
Using a scalar form of the Biot-Savart Law, and assuming a unit depth for the volume integral, I get...
B = (μ0/4\pi) * (J * Area)/r2

After plugging numbers in, I arrive at: ΔB = 1.1111*10-12 T = 1.110 pT

Is this anywhere close, or even sound right? I have the tendency to pull ideas out of thin air.

Thanks,
Zack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First thought:
Using a scalar form of the Biot-Savart Law
Why do you do that?
 
I was assuming a scalar form because:
1) All values given to me in the problem statement are scalar, not vector.
2) I really have no idea how to do the problem. Doing that is my best attempt at the problem.
 
Sorry for the delayed response, I had some trouble getting to the site yesterday.
harlowz2 said:
I was assuming a scalar form because:
1) All values given to me in the problem statement are scalar, not vector.
OK, well, it's a good thought, but that's not a correct assumption. Even if you're only given scalar values in the question, you will still generally have to use the vector form of the equation. The scalar version you used applies only under certain very specific conditions.

In this case, you'll have to use the geometry of the problem to determine the vectors you need to use. I would suggest starting by drawing a diagram, and if you can, upload it as an attachment here.
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top