Rotational motion, frictionless.

AI Thread Summary
A cylinder with a mass of 4kg and a moment of inertia of 0.02 kg.m² experiences linear acceleration of 5.0 m/s² without rotation due to negligible friction. The relationship Fr=Iα remains valid even when the rolling condition α=ar does not apply, as linear and angular accelerations can be computed separately. In a zero-gravity environment, a yo-yo will behave similarly to the cylinder, accelerating and spinning in the direction it is pulled. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which these rotational motion equations apply. The concept of finding the instantaneous center of rotation is also suggested for further exploration.
azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/8148/rollwx.jpg

A rope is wound around a cylinder of mass 4kg, and I=0.02kg.m2 about the cylinder axis.
The frictional force between table and cylinder is negligible.

Solution:
a=20/4=5.0m/s2
α=ar is not applicable when slippage occurs.


My question.
1.Is the cylinder moves forward with acceleration a without any rotation.
2. Is Fr=Iα is still applicable in this case, even though we know α=ar not applicable.
3. If we play yo-yo in zero gravity environment,how does the yo-yo behave when we pull it?

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. No, see 2.
2. Yes, Fr=Iα is always applicable. α=ar constraint is only needed for rolling, and is achieved via additional force, that being the force of friction. When no friction is present, you just compute angular and linear accelerations separately.
3. Yo-yo in zero-g will behave exactly the same as this test case. It will accelerate and spin in direction it's being pulled.
 
Thank you.
That really helpful since the book didn't say about rotation only a=αr is not applicable.
 
A nice question to ask here is to find the instantaneous centre of rotation.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top