The physics behind the thermal light quantum imaging?

zaccurio
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does it indicate that the " spooky action(correlation)" even can be found in classical level, where entanglement is hardly can be built?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermal light ghost imaging works in a classical manner without entanglement. Correlation is there, but it is not a spooky action at all. In thermal ghost imaging you typically shine laser light through a rotating ground glass disk. This will create a diffraction pattern which varies rapidly with time. Now you send this diffraction pattern through a beam splitter and place the iimage you want to look at and a single pixel detector in one arm and the position sensitive detector in the other arm. The image will reappear in the coincidence counts between the single pixel detector and the position sensitive detector because the two beams are classically correlated without involving any spooky action. They simply are the same time-varying diffraction pattern.

In principle it is also possible to do this kind of experiment completely without the second position sensitive detector. If you can deterministically create the time-varying diffraction pattern - for example using a digital micromirror device or a spatial light modulator - you can correlate the signal on the single-pixel camera with the pattern the other detector would have seen (you can calculate it as the diffraction pattern is created deterministically) and will find the image by doing so. If you are interested in this topic, a good overview and comparison of classical versus non-classical ghost imaging methods can be found in Jeffrey Shapiro's overview article "ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational" (Advances in Optics and Photonics, Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 405-450 (2010)).
It is very detailed.
 
thank u very much. I got some brief notion. I then wonder the imaging thing just give a illusion of imagining by a trick of "coincidence counts". I will squezee out sometime to have a detailed learning .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top