Cross section computation - Huang's Statistical Mechanics

QuArK21343
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I am reading chapter three of Huang's Statistical Mechanics and I have a problem with equation (3.22). Having discussed the derivation of the classical cross section for a scattering process, Huang moves on to the quantum version of it. He states that in quantum mechanics the fundamental quantity in a scattering process is the matrix T, that represents an operator T(E):

T=<1',2'|T(E)|1,2>

where |1,2> is the initial state ket of the system of two particles and the primed ket is the final state ket. He also writes:

T(E)=H'+H'(E-H_0+i\epsilon)^{-1}H'+\dots

where H_0 is the unperturbed hamiltonian, H' the potential and epsilon goes to zero. I don't understand what he means by that. Can you explain what I am missing or give me some reference? Up to now, the first two chapters were really good and I enjoyed them, but given that I have only a basic knowledge of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (one dimensional problems, bra-ket notation and not much more), do you think is it useful to go on reading this book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need some perturbation theory for QM, but Huang's stat mech doesn't rely too much on perturbation theory, so shouldn't be a big problem. For your question, this is essentially a Born approximation, c.f. Sakurai, "Modern quantum mechanics, revised edition", chap 7.2, and 7.2.20 is exactly what you wrote, but you probably need to read from the beginning of the chapter.
 
Thank you very much for your reference! By pure coincidence I am also reading Sakurai's book, so I will definitely have a look.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top