What Happens to the Excess Energy in a Compressed Spring?

AI Thread Summary
When a spring is compressed by a constant force, the work done is calculated as Fx, resulting in kx^2. However, the energy stored in the spring is actually 1/2kx^2, indicating that the additional work done is converted into kinetic energy when a mass is attached. As the spring compresses, the force increases from zero to kx, meaning the average force is F/2, leading to the energy equation. When an external electric field is applied, it exerts a constant force, causing the mass to oscillate around a new equilibrium point. The discussion clarifies the relationship between work done, energy storage, and kinetic energy in spring dynamics.
jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
If you apply a force F and compress a spring of spring constant k by x distance what is the work done by us?
I know energy stored is 1/2kx2 but is the work done by us the same?
We are applying a cosntant force F and dispalcement is x so work done by us should be Fx right? And F = kx so work done by us is kx2

Where does the other 1/2kx2 go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jd12345 said:
Where does the other 1/2kx2 go?
Imagine there was a mass on the end of the spring. If you used the minimum force required to compress the spring, then that force would vary from 0 (at the start) to the maximum value of kX at full compression. The work you'd do would equal 1/2kx2. But if you use a constant force F = kX to compress the spring, then the extra work that you do goes into increasing the kinetic energy of the mass.
 
I agree with DocAl
When you start to compress(or stretch) the spring you start with zero force and increase to final force,F and F = kx. The work done = average force x extension.
If the spring behaves linearly the average force = F/2 therefore work done = kx/2 . x
= 0.5kx^2
 
Okay thank you - but one more doubt
Suppsoe a mass m attached to a spring with charge q. Suddenly electric field is switched on so it will exert a constant force right? So in this case the other 1/kx^2 goes into kinetic energy and the spring oscillates? Have i got it right?
 
That's right. The mass will oscillate about the new equilibrium point (where the net force on the mass is zero).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top