Did Olympus Mons Cause Mars' Lack of Electromagnetic Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dizzolve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lost Mars
dizzolve
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all this is my first post. I'm not formally educated in physics concepts but find so much about it very interesting.

I registered to ask if this is plausible:

It appears we attribute our electromagnetic field on Earth to it's behavior deep inside the planet. There is supposedly a solid core in the middle surrounded by what might be molten metal that circulates in some regular way which creates the field. Right?

On Mars resides the largest volcano in the solar system in Olympus Mons. Is it possible that much of Mars' required ingredient for an electromagnetic field (molten metal) was lost through this volcano and therefore couldn't maintain it's electromagnetic field?
 
Space news on Phys.org
No, it's not possible. The amount of matter ejected by that volcano is tiny compared to the size of the planet.
The only reason the volcano got so large is because of the absence of plate tectonics. On Earth for example, the crust would move over time, and the result would be a chain of volcanoes, instead of a single large one.

The reason Mars lost its internal dynamo seems to be its size. Mars is simply too small and the core froze over time. Larger planets, like Earth, take far longer for that to happen.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top