I have got the answer about test charge,but have not got a clear idea about point charge.I know,whenever we calculate the field of a distribution of charges at any point we do integration to add up the individual contribution at that point.We divide the surface of any charged object into small surface areas (like σ=Q/A,Q=total charge,A=surface area,or linear charge density or volume charge density),and consider them as point charges and then integrate the total contribution.My question was why we always start our calculation with point charges,why we take charge density (σ) first to calculate the field of that charge distribution (such as long charged sheet,charged ring etc)...
I prepared my answer earlier.I was just testing whether I am right or wrong.My conception is given below.Please tell me whether I am right or wrong."Consider a charged body A,and a small test charge q.The force exerted by the test charge q on the charge distribution on body A may cause this distribution to shift around.This is specially true if body A is a conductor,on which charge (electrons) is easy to move.So the electric field around A when q is present may not be the same as when q is absent.But if q is very small,the redistribution of on charged body A is also small.So to make a complete correct distribution of electric field,we take the limit of test charge q approaches zero (q→0) and as the disturbing effect of q on the charge distribution becomes negligible.In practical calculations of the electric field produced by a charge distribution,we will consider the charge distribution to be fixed.Shifting of charge distribution in small conductors (like a point object) may be considered negligible.But in conductors those are not small,this shifting is not negligible.That's why we always consider point charges."(I am not a native English speaker.That's why my English may be bad.Sorry.)