How to Express Sets with Specific Cardinality Restrictions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xeon123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the expression B={X ∈ A:|X|<3}, which indicates that B is a set containing elements from A that have fewer than three elements. Participants emphasize that B should include subsets of A where each subset has a cardinality of at most 2. An example provided is B={{1,2},{3}}, demonstrating valid subsets under this condition. The conversation confirms that the expression accurately reflects the intended cardinality restrictions. Overall, the focus is on correctly interpreting set notation and cardinality in mathematical expressions.
xeon123
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
In the expression of sets: B={X \in A:|X|<3} the expression is saying that B is a set that contains at most 3 sets X that belongs to A, right?

How do we say, B is a set that contains elements of X that belongs to A, and all X elements contains at most 3 x elements (the cardinality of X is at most 2). For example, B={{1,2},{3}}. And not, B={{1,2,3}}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hi xeon123! :smile:
xeon123 said:
In the expression of sets: B={X \in A:|X|<3} the expression is saying that B is a set that contains at most 3 sets X that belongs to A, right?

no, it's saying that B is the collection of all elements of A with less than 3 elements
 
xeon123 said:
How do we say, B is a set that contains elements of X that belongs to A, and all X elements contains at most 3 x elements (the cardinality of X is at most 2). For example, B={{1,2},{3}}. And not, B={{1,2,3}}
Assuming you meant "B is the set that consists of elements X that belong to A and which contain at most 2 elements" then: B={X \in A:|X|<3}
Your example works provided that the only elements of A with less than three elements are the two you show.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top