Why is the Universe electrically neutral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lpetrich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutral Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the question of why the Universe is electrically neutral, with a proposed explanation linking its origin to a gauge singlet, which inherently has zero electric charge. This concept suggests that if the Universe originated from a quantum fluctuation, it would naturally be electrically neutral. The idea of gauge symmetry is also mentioned as a possible reason for this neutrality, indicating that only a gauge singlet has a single member, reinforcing the notion of charge neutrality. If evidence were found that the Universe is not electrically neutral, it would challenge the gauge-singlet theory and necessitate a new explanation for the creation of matter. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and implications of the Universe's charge neutrality.
lpetrich
Science Advisor
Messages
998
Reaction score
180
That's a conundrum that I've seen posed -- certain people have claimed that it's very improbable.

But here is what I think is a plausible solution. If the Universe originated from a quantum fluctuation or something similar, it would have to have originated as a gauge singlet. Being a gauge singlet means having zero electric charge, thus implying that the Universe is electrically neutral.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Which changes to the question of why it has to be a gauge singlet of course. Discovery that the Universe is not electrically neutral would mean that the gauge-singlet idea of the creation of matter is wrong and we'd have to come up with something else. So - is this a strong argument?

"Certain people" would be the "Electric Universe" and "Plasma Cosmology" crowd?

Some discussions into why it is likely that the Universe is electrically neutral:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=215189

The question of how it came to be that the Universe is charge-neutral on the large scale is quite deep ... a simple look:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/wcep.html
... gives some of the idea.
 
In post #39 that thread, xantox proposed that the Universe is electrically neutral (total charge = 0) because of gauge symmetry.

I think that that's another version of the gauge-singlet idea.

That's because one can always find a gauge-symmetry operator that can transform one member into another of an irreducible-representation gauge multiplet. Only for a singlet is there only one member to choose from.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top