Mastering Composite and Inverse Functions: Examples and Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter lionel messi.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
Composite functions involve applying two functions in succession, where the order of operations matters, as demonstrated by the example of f(x) = x^3 and g(x) = x + 2, resulting in different outcomes for g(f(x)) and f(g(x)). Inverse functions allow for the reversal of operations, with f^{-1}(x) representing the inverse of f(x), such that f(f^{-1}(x)) = x and vice versa. For instance, the inverse of cubing, f(x) = x^3, is the cube root, f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3}. Not all functions have inverses; for example, f(x) = x^2 lacks an inverse without restricting its domain to ensure a one-to-one relationship. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering composite and inverse functions in mathematics.
lionel messi.
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi all, can someone please give description about the use of composite and inverse functions with examples...? any help will be appreciated :!)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Composition of functions" refers to appling to functions in succession. For example, if f(x)= x^3 (whatever x is, cube it) and g(x)= x+ 2 (whatever x is, add 2) then composition g(f(x)) means- what ever x is, first cube it, then add 2. Here, g(f(x))= x^3+ 2. Composition of functions is NOT "commutative"- that is, changing the order may give a different result: g(f(x)), here, means "first add 2 then cube the result: f(g(x))= (x+ 3)^3= x^3+ 9x^2+ 27x+ 27.

Of course, whenever we do an operation, we would like to be able to "undo" it. That is exactly what the "inverse" function does: If we write f^{-1}(x) to mean its inverse function, f^{-1}(f(x))= x and f(f^{-1}(x))= x, With f(x)= x^3, f^{-1}(x)= \sqrt[3](x)= x^{1/3}. That is, the "inverse" of cubing is the cube root. f(f^{-1}(x)= (\sqrt[3](x))^3= x or f(f^{-1}(x))= (x^{1/3})^3= x and f^{-1}(f(x))= \sqrt[3](x^3) or f^{-1}(f(x))= (x^3)^{1/3}= x.

Similarly if g(x)= x+ 3, then g^{-1}(x)= x- 3. That is, the inverse of "add three" is "subtract 3". g(g^{-1}(x))= (x- 3)+ 3= x and g^{-1}(g(x))= (x+ 3)- 3= x.

More generally, we can think of "y= f(x)" as a set of pairs of numbers, f= {(x,y)}= {(x, f(x))}. And then the inverse just swaps "x" and "y"- the pairs corresponding to (y, x): f^{-1}= (y, x)= (y, f^{-1}(y))

You need to be aware that many functions do NOT have inverses! For example, the function f(x)= x^2 does not have an inverse because both f(-2) and f(2) are equal to 4 so there is no single number we can call "f^{-1}(4). What we often do in that case is restrict the domain so the function is "one to one"- but then we have a different function. If we define f(x)= x^2 with x restricted to be non-negative, then we can say that f^{-1}(x)= \sqrt{x}. And if we define g(x)= x^2 with x restricted to be non-positive, then g^{-1}(x)= -\sqrt{x}.
 
Thanks a bunch!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top