How long will it take for the Earth to become tidally locked to the Moon?

AI Thread Summary
The Earth is expected to eventually become tidally locked to the Moon, similar to how the Moon is currently locked to the Earth. Tidal braking is currently slowing Earth's rotation by about a millisecond per century, but this process will take an impractically long time, potentially outlasting the Sun's lifespan. The assumption of constant tidal braking is flawed, as the Moon is receding from Earth, reducing the braking effect over time. Additionally, Earth's oceans are predicted to evaporate in a few billion years, further diminishing tidal braking. Consequently, the process of tidal locking is effectively projected to take nearly eternity.
mofobro
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
According to an article I read,
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/tides.html

the Earth will one day become tidally locked to the moon the way the moon is locked to the Earth today, so that the same face of the Earth always faces the moon.

If this is true, how long will that process take?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Tidal braking is slowing the Earth's rotation by about a millisecond per century. Assuming that was to remain constant, it would take so long for Earth to become tidally locked with the moon, our sun would have long since become a white dwarf. We do, however, know the assumption of constant braking is invalid. Tidal braking also causes the moon to receed from Earth which will diminish the braking effect over time. We also know that Earth will lose its oceans within a few billion years, which will eliminate the source of most tidal braking. In short, the answer effectively becomes nearly eternity.
 
A slightly better rule-of-thumb is that the Earth loses a third of its rotational energy per billion years. Over 5 billion years, that yields a factor of (2/3)^5 ~ 32/243 ~ 1/7.5 and hence a factor of between 2.5 and 3 for the rotational period (inverse square dependence on energy). So, if things were to continue going smoothly, the day would be some 60 hours long by the end. However, as Chronos said, the oceans are expected to evaporate long before that, which will make further braking far less effective.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top