Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) Interpretation

citw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Very commonly in thin film articles/journals, I find the full width at half maximum of X-ray rocking curves associated with the quality (order) of the surface. For example, if the same material is grown on two different substrates, A and B, with FWHM values of 0.11° for A and 0.6° for B, why do we interpret the quality of the A film to be better than B? In other words, why does a lower FWHM indicate higher crystalline quality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
citw said:
Very commonly in thin film articles/journals, I find the full width at half maximum of X-ray rocking curves associated with the quality (order) of the surface. For example, if the same material is grown on two different substrates, A and B, with FWHM values of 0.11° for A and 0.6° for B, why do we interpret the quality of the A film to be better than B? In other words, why does a lower FWHM indicate higher crystalline quality?

It means the sharper the peak, the less spread in the crystal lattice values. It is more ordered.

Zz.
 
Your comment helped me locate a pretty good explanation for different material parameters:

www1.chm.colostate.edu/Files/HRXRD.pdf

Thanks for the help.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
100
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top