Why photon loss energy when escape from a black hole ?

big_bounce
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
Hello all .
Why photon increase energy and frequency when falls in gravitational field ? or decrease it's energy when escape from a black hole ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"or decrease it's energy when escape from a black hole ?"

E = mc2
You can read more about this formula here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence

Black holes have an incredibly low temperature. Any photon whose energy is greater than that of the background radiation will contribute to the mass of the black hole.
 
Assuming you mean move away from a black hole, so long as the photon hasn't entered the Event Horizon.

Take a baseball. Drop it. The closer it gets to the black hole, the faster it'll be moving. (Ignoring gravitational time-dilation effects, I won't go into those right now.) As it moves more quickly, it gains more kinetic energy. If you throw a baseball away from a black hole, the black hole's gravity will bring it to a halt (and then pull it in,) decreasing its kinetic energy.

The same holds for a photon. Not the speed bit, as they always locally move at c, but the energy bit. You might be wondering how it actually loses the energy, as again, photons always move at c (locally.) Now here's where the time dilation becomes important to our thought experiment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_redshift

Basically, while a photon moves away from a gravitating body, its frequency decreases. As the energy of a photon is proportional to its frequency, its energy also decreases.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top