Does a Detector Alter Diffraction Patterns in the Two-Slit Experiment?

rp1220
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the two slit experiment when which path information is present there is no wave interference pattern such as would be seen with both slits being used. When a single slit is used there is a visible diffraction pattern. Is such a pattern seen when a detector forces a one slit path in the two slit experiment ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With "which path information", you'll still see single-slit interference patterns if the measurement does not measure additional information about the precise position of the particle in the slit.
 
rp1220 said:
In the two slit experiment when which path information is present there is no wave interference pattern such as would be seen with both slits being used. When a single slit is used there is a visible diffraction pattern. Is such a pattern seen when a detector forces a one slit path in the two slit experiment ?

to add to what mfb has already said...

the degree of diffraction/interference is inversely proportional to the degree of precision/probability (of particle/photon location).

its not a yes or no, 1 or 0, interference or no-interference, which-way or no-which-way thing
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top