Is Acceleration of Acceleration a Valid Concept in Physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chocolatesheep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "acceleration of acceleration," often referred to as "jerk," and its implications in physics. Participants explore the theoretical framework of higher-order derivatives of motion, particularly in relation to gravitational effects on an object, such as an asteroid being pulled towards Earth. The conversation touches on both conceptual and practical aspects of this idea.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if an object's acceleration changes over time, it could be described as "acceleration of acceleration," suggesting a mathematical formulation for this concept.
  • Another participant identifies "jerk" as the term used for the derivative of acceleration, indicating a recognized terminology in physics.
  • A further contribution mentions that higher-order derivatives are typically not the primary focus in solving motion problems, advocating for the use of differential equations instead.
  • One participant provides a practical example involving braking in a car to illustrate the concept of jerk and its effects on passenger comfort.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the validity or utility of the concept of acceleration of acceleration. While some participants acknowledge the terminology and implications of jerk, others emphasize different approaches to understanding motion, leading to multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or conceptual nuances surrounding the application of higher-order derivatives in physics, nor does it clarify the assumptions underlying the proposed scenarios.

chocolatesheep
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I was wondering about this.
If the position of an object changes in time, the object has velocity.
If the velocity of an object changes in time, the object is accelerating (decelerating)
If the acceleration of an object changes in time, could we hypothetically have acceleration of acceleration.

I have this scenario in my head:
An asteroid is at rest, far away from earth. The Earth starts dragging the asteroid towards it. The asteroid will accelerate towards Earth ever so slightly (since gravity depends on distance)
The closer it gets to earth, not only will it go faster, but it will also accelerate faster.
So we will have the change of acceleration in time:
a\prime = \lim_{\Delta t\to\ 0}\frac{\Delta a}{\Delta t}

So acceleration of acceleration would be in \frac{m}{s^3} or rather \frac{\frac{m}{s^2}}{s} if it appeals more.

Would this be useful? We could calculate the exact acceleration in any given moment as opposed to having the average acceleration.
But that's beside the point since we could always calculate the exact acceleration if we know how far it is from a planet.

But if we needed to know the exact speed of the asteroid after let's say 20 hours, we would get an incorrect answer if we treated the acceleration as if it were constant.

So a_1 = a_0 \pm a\prime t
so if a_0 = 0 then a_1 = a\prime t

and if v_1 = v_0 \pm at
and if v_0 = 0 then v_1 = at

=> v_1 = a\prime t^2 if the object is starting to move from rest

Does any of this make sense?
Waiting for someone to point out a flaw in this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't read through but a' is called the "jerk".
 
After "jerk", the next three derivitives are affectionately known as "snap", "crackle" and "pop".

Ordinarily one does not attack these kinds of problems by looking at higher and higher order derivitives though. Instead one writes down a differential equation that relates, for instance, acceleration to velocity and position.

One can use differential calculus to attempt to solve such an equation, reducing it to a form that expresses position as a function of time.

Failing that, there are computational methods (such as Runge Kutta) that generate approximate solutions by running a kind of simulation and advancing stepwise. Such approaches often treat the second derivative (acceleration) as a variable and work in part by estimating its average value over the duration of each small step.

This sounds similar to what you are talking about.
 
You can do a simple experiment to 'feel' this when braking your automobile.

As you get it almost stopped, lighten pressure on the brake so you don't slam back into seat when it stops, instead making a gradual approach to rest.

Acceleration with a negative sign is the force pushing you forward. Your passengers will appreciate your awareness of and attention to "jerk".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K