Velocity and Acceleration together problem?

AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for the father to catch his son, one must analyze their positions over time. The son runs at a constant velocity of 3.0 m/s, while the father accelerates from rest at 1.5 m/s². By calculating the distance covered by both the father and son at specific time intervals, one can find when their distances are equal. The father's speed increases each second, allowing for a comparison of their positions over time. Ultimately, the problem can be solved by equating their distances as functions of time.
kencamarador
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
A boy is running a a constant velocity of 3.0 m/s [E] and passes his father who is standing still. The father immediately starts to chase his son with a constant acceleration of 1.5m/s at the instant his that his son reachers him

How long does it take the father to catch his son
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you do so far? Where did you run into problems?
 
mfb said:
What did you do so far? Where did you run into problems?

None so far. I do not understand this at all... How can I calculate Time if I have both velocity and acceleration?
 
I don't see the problem.
You can imagine this in real life, right? The father will reach his son at some point, and you have everything you need to determine the position of father and son for every point in time. You have to find the time where those two positions are the same.
 
If I am understanding your question correctly you can solve it like this...
acceleration is meters per second per second or m/s^2
since the fathers acceleration is CONSTANT after 1 second the father will be at v = 1.5 m/s
and after 2 seconds the father will be at v = 3.0 m/s
and after 3 seconds he will be at v = 4.5 m/s

but the boy is moving at 3 meters per second (constant)
so after 2 seconds he will be 6 meters away from the position he passed his father
and after 3 seconds he will 9 meters away from the position he passed his father

so calculate the distance his father moves at the same time intervals and I think you should get the answer.
 
If you replace those timesteps by a general (real) variable t, this works.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top