Avoid Infractions: How to Be a Safe Member

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natassha
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Infractions on the forum range from 0 to 10 points, with first offenses typically resulting in warnings rather than points. Members are encouraged to read the rules to avoid infractions, which include prohibitions against insults, spam, and personal information sharing. Immediate infractions are issued for serious offenses like crackpottery and trolling, while new members often receive warnings for less severe mistakes, such as improper thread titles or posting in the wrong sections. Ignoring warnings can lead to more severe infractions, especially for repeated offenses. Adhering to the forum's guidelines is essential for maintaining a safe and respectful community.
Natassha
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I found that infraction are sent here in points 0 to 10. Please explain what type of post get infraction and of what point. And how to be a safe member here without any infraction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Click on the Rules link at the top of this page (or any page here), and read it.

Be respectful of other people here. Don't insult them, etc.

Stick to "real science", not crackpot stuff.
 
If you don't want to get an infraction, then you need to read the rules and follow them: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380

Typically, first offenses don't get any infractions but they merely get warnings. Warnings serve to remind you of the relevant rules. The name "warning" sounds far too serious and it should be "notice" or "reminder" instead, but I think we're in the process of changing that. In any case, a warning should not be taken very seriously: it doesn't give you any infraction points or anything. They are merely reminders.

Now, the trouble begins if you ignore the "warnings" (or if your first offense is a very heavy one). If we give you a warning about doing something wrong, and you just do the same thing again, then you will be given an infraction. If you keep doing the same thing wrong, then you will be given more (and heavier) infractions.

Things that get an immediate infraction from me (so with no previous warnings) are
  • Obvious crackpottery
  • Insults
  • Spam
  • Posting personal information about another member (without permission)
  • Trolling
So basically, these are things that you know are not permitted without even reading the rules.

Some offenses that new people make (and that get warnings):
  • Not posting homework in the homework section (note: if you are self-studying and you are solving problems from a textbook, then it also belongs in homework)
  • Making a thread title that is not descriptive (such as "Please help me nowwwww!")
  • Bumping a thread too fast or too much (you should try to bump only after 24 hours have passed, and even then bump only once)
  • Posting a thread multiple times in different forums (if you have posted a thread in the wrong section, then just report it and the mentors will move it for you)
  • Asking a question cold (see https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3588 )
These seem to be the most typical things that new members do to get warnings. For a full list, you'll need to read the rules.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also note that first offense can also be given an infraction point (not just a warning) if it is "severe" enough. For example, a member posting HW-type post in several different places. Not only did this member ignored the notice, in red, before he/she made that post to not post outside of the HW/Coursework forum, but also violate the multiple-post rule. So when that happens, a Mentor may decide that the multiple violations deserve an infraction right away rather than a warning.

Note that outright promotion of crackpottery and spamming do not get warnings. They get banned immediately.

While what to send out is clear in most cases, in some cases, a judgement call is needed.

Zz.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
260
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
142
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top