Interaction of electromagnetic waves with a plane mirror

AI Thread Summary
A plane mirror reflects light due to its metal coating acting as a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, which maintains a zero electric field. When electromagnetic waves hit the mirror, electrons rearrange to reflect the light back. Introducing a current to the mirror's surface would create an electric field, altering the behavior of incoming light. A thought experiment with radio antennae illustrates that signals arriving at different phases can interfere destructively in all directions except one, resulting in a reflected wave. This principle applies similarly to light, where induced currents in a metal sheet would generate re-radiated waves, producing radiation primarily in the direction of reflection.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19
I was reading about how a plane mirror reflects light and would like confirmation I have the right theory. It says that the metal coating of a mirror is a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium which means the electric field is zero. As the electromagnetic wave hits the mirror the electrons re-arrange themselves to keep the electric field zero. The only way to do this is reflect the light back. If we were to set up some kind of situation so as to induce a current on the surface of the mirror (by connecting some kind of power source) what would then happen to the incoming light since we would now have an electric field. My maths is not brilliant so please don't throw lots of equations at me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A thought experiment involving radio waves might be easier to get to grips with. Imagine a set of radio antennae, in a row, in the path of a radio wave (a plane wave, to make it easier) which arrives at an angle. The signals arriving at each of these antennae would all be the same except for their phases (because the wave arrives at slightly different times for each antenna). Now imagine making a recording of each of the received signals and then replaying it in antiphase (keeping things perfectly synchronised). The signals from all of the antenna would radiate out in all directions but, in all directions but one, they would add up (interfere) to give zero resultant. The only direction that any resultant would be formed would be in the direction of what we'd usually call the 'reflected' wave (i.e. symmetrically about the Normal to the plane of the line of the antennae. Replacing the individual antennae with a sheet of metal, the currents induced in each part of the sheet would, in fact, be such as to generate equal and opposite re-radiated waves (wavelets) from each point. This will produce radiation only in one direction - again, because there is destructive interference in all other directions.
Replace radio waves with light and scale things down 'a bit' in size and the same argument applies.
No Maths - OK?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top