Charging a system of metal rods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum charge that can accumulate on two metal rods of definite length without causing electrical discharge. The electric field of a charged rod is approximated using the formula for an infinite rod, but concerns arise regarding its applicability to finite rods, as the field strength varies across the surface. The charge distribution on conducting rods is not uniform, with higher densities near the ends, complicating the calculations. A suggestion is made to solve Laplace's equation numerically to determine the electric potential and subsequently the electric field. The user seeks a rough estimate for maximum charge to proceed with their model, questioning the validity of using infinite rod assumptions.
rijulg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to charge a system of two metal rods, of definite length, placed a certain distance apart. But before setting up the rods and hooking them to any battery, i wish to know the magnitude of charge that will be accumulated on the rods and what is the maximum possible charge on the rods, so as to just prevent electrical discharge
 
Physics news on Phys.org
we know that field of a charged rod (infinite, or finite near center) is ~ E= λ/(2πϵr), and maximum possible electric field is 3 x 10^6 N/C, so putting the values we get relation between λ and r, knowing length of rod, we can calculate maximum charge on one rod with respect to radius of cross section of rod. But i doubt the applicability and validity of this method
 
rijulg said:
But i doubt the applicability and validity of this method

Why?
 
jtbell said:
Why?

because this approximation is for infinite charge rod, and for a finite charge rod, the field might be more on the axis, so when i will charge my rod according to calculations of infinite rod, it may discharge from the axis
 
Ah, I overlooked the "definite length" in your first post. It seems you want the electric field at all points near a cylinder with given length. This is not a simple problem, even if the cylinder has a circular cross-section (the most symmetric situation) and the charge is uniform. The field does not have the same strength or direction everywhere on the surface. It's not like an infinite circular cylinder where you can assume the field is perpendicular to the surface of the cylinder.

Also, you're using conducting (metal) rods, which means the charge is not uniformly distributed. It's all at the surface of the rods, and with probably a higher (surface) charge density near the ends of the rod.

I think you have to solve Laplace's equation numerically for the electric potential, with the condition that the surfaces of the rods are equipotentials, then find the electric field by taking the gradient of the potential. Maybe someone else has a better idea.
 
jtbell said:
Ah, I overlooked the "definite length" in your first post. It seems you want the electric field at all points near a cylinder with given length. This is not a simple problem, even if the cylinder has a circular cross-section (the most symmetric situation) and the charge is uniform. The field does not have the same strength or direction everywhere on the surface. It's not like an infinite circular cylinder where you can assume the field is perpendicular to the surface of the cylinder.

Also, you're using conducting (metal) rods, which means the charge is not uniformly distributed. It's all at the surface of the rods, and with probably a higher (surface) charge density near the ends of the rod.

I think you have to solve Laplace's equation numerically for the electric potential, with the condition that the surfaces of the rods are equipotentials, then find the electric field by taking the gradient of the potential. Maybe someone else has a better idea.

Actually i need very less out of the problem, i just need to find out the maximum amount of charge possible on the rod, even a rough estimate and then i will charge it with somewhat lesser charge than the acquired answer, but to find out that rough estimate i am not sure if infinite rod estimation will be of any actual use, if someone can even just give a way to find out an assuring approximation of max. charge so that i can start building a model, it would be great
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top