Are Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology Directly Linked?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimjohnson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology Qm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential connection between Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology, as suggested by Dr. Dimitar Valev's article. It highlights the derivation of dimensionless ratios from equations involving the Planck constant and the Hubble constant, indicating a significant link between the two fields. Key equations presented include those for the mass of the universe, Planck mass, Hubble distance, and Planck length, leading to a dimensionless ratio N that is calculated from fundamental parameters. The discussion notes that unlike other large numbers, this ratio is exact and derived from established constants. The thread concludes with a reminder that only peer-reviewed articles are permissible for discussion.
jimjohnson
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I recently read an article (http://vixra.org/abs/1308.0143) written by an acquaintance, Dr Dimitar Valev and wanted opinions on its relevance .
Basically, dimensionless ratios are derived from equations based on both the Planck constant and the Hubble constant. Thus, Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology are directly linked - a possible significant observation.
The key equations are:
MU = c3/2GH - Mass of the gravitationally connected universe
MPL = (cħ/2G)1/2 - Planck Mass (Compton wavelength (ħ/mc) = gravitational radius (2Gm/c2))
RU = c/H - Hubble distance (radius of universe)
LPL = (2Għ/c3)1/2 - Planck length
The dimensionless ratios are:
MU/ MPL = RU/ LPL = (c5/2GH2ħ)1/2 = N (if H = 2.18x10-18/sec, N = 6.04x1060)
Based on algebra, N also equals: (Planck Density/Critical Density)1/2; and, similar ratios of age and time.
Other large numbers obtained from ratios, like Dirac's, are not exact and contrived; but, this N is exact and calculated from four fundamental parameters.
Comments?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Sorry, but only articles published in peer-reviewed journals are allowed to be discussed here at PF.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top