Why can k in the Delta Function equation be both positive and negative?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the Delta Function equation, the variable k can take both positive and negative values due to its role in the transformation of the function. The equation \(\delta(k x) = \frac{1}{|k|} \delta(k x)\) holds under the condition that k is not equal to zero. When k is positive, the integral simplifies to \(\frac{1}{k} f(0)\), while for negative k, it results in \(-\frac{1}{k} f(0)\). This demonstrates that the Delta function behaves consistently regardless of the sign of k, as long as the appropriate substitutions are made. The discussion also touches on generalizations for arbitrary functions with single-order zeros, reinforcing the versatility of the Delta function in mathematical analysis.
mathnerd15
Messages
109
Reaction score
0
in this equation why does k take on both positive and negative values? isn't k a fixed constant that can only be positive or negative
 

Attachments

  • Dirac.gif
    Dirac.gif
    5.2 KB · Views: 478
Physics news on Phys.org
mathnerd15 said:
in this equation why does k take on both positive and negative values? isn't k a fixed constant that can only be positive or negative

ques. not visible
 
oh you have to click on the attachment and then the picture to see the equation. so the domain of the function is kx so if k ranges from -infinity to infinity then you need a +- before the integral?
 
Last edited:
It's just an example for pretty unclear notation. I guess the formula is an attempt to prove the equation
\delta(k x)=\frac{1}{|k|} \delta(k x).
Of course you have to assume that k \neq 0. Otherwise the equation doesn't make any sense to begin with.

Then you have to just do the substitution y=k x in the integral with the distribution times an arbitrary test function to prove this formula. For k>0 you find
\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x f(x) \delta(k x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}y \frac{1}{k} f(y/k) \delta(y)=\frac{1}{k} f(0).
For k<0 you have
\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x f(x) \delta(k x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} y \left (-\frac{1}{k} \right ) f(y/k) \delta (y)=-\frac{1}{k} f(0).
On the other hand the distribution
\frac{1}{|k|} \delta(x)
has the same outcome under an integral with an arbitrary test function, which proves the above statement about the Dirac distribution.

You can generalize this for arbitrary function y(x) which have only single-order zeros, i.e., y(x_k)=0 but y'(x_k) \neq 0 for k \in \{1,\ldots,n\}. Then you can prove in pretty much the same way as the above example
\delta[y(x)]=\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{|y'(x_k)|} \delta(x-x_k).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
f(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{R}e^{ipx}\left ( \int_{R}f(\alpha)d\alpha \right )dp=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{R}\left (\int_{R}e^{ipx}e^{-ip\alpha}\right)f(\alpha)d\alpha= \int_{R}\delta (x-\alpha)f(\alpha)d\alpha. where,\delta(x-a)=\int_{R}e^{ip(x-\alpha)}\left dp. [/tex]as you know Cauchy expressed Fourier&#039;s integral as exponentials and the delta distribution can be expressed in this way (he also pointed out that the integrals are non-commutative in some circumstances). In modern times there is L Schwartz&#039;s theory of distributions. Dirac called it the delta function because he used it as a continuous analogue of the discrete Kronecker delta.<br /> Here is a vast generalization of the fundamental theorem of algebra
 

Attachments

Last edited:
(x+y)^{N+1}=_{0}^{N+1}\textrm{C}x^{N+1}+\sum_{k=1}^{N}(_{k}^{N}\textrm{C}+_{k-1}^{N}\textrm{C})x^{N+1-k}y^{k}+_{N+1}^{N+1}\textrm{C}y^{N+1}=_{0}^{N+1}\textrm{C}x^{N+1}+\sum_{k=1}^{N}_{k}^{N+1}\textrm{C}x^{(N+1)-k}y^{k}+_{N+1}^{N+1}\textrm{C}y^{N+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{N+1}_{k}^{N+1}{C}x^{(N+1)-k}y^{k}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top