Calculate PSI of Hollow Cube with Hole Opened

  • Thread starter Thread starter daviddjh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations Psi
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the psi of the hollow cube structure after the hole opens, Boyle's Law (PV=c) can be applied, considering the initial conditions of the cube. The cylinder, which is 14 cm long with a radius of 2 cm, will contain a vacuum after the air is released from the cube. This simplifies the calculations, as the cylinder does not need to account for atmospheric pressure. The change in volume and pressure can be determined using the initial psi of the cube and the volume of the cylinder. Understanding these principles allows for accurate pressure calculations in the modified structure.
daviddjh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a hollow cube with a volume of 504c3. The inside of the cube has a psi of 94 and is just air. Now suppose that a hole opened in the bottom of this cube with an area of 12.56cm2 that leads to a hollow cylinder that is 14 cm long with a radius of 2cm. Now how would you go about calculating the psi of this whole structure after the hole is opened, the air is released and the volume has changed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the cylinder contain air at normal atmospheric pressure, or is it vacuum?
 
Nugatory said:
Does the cylinder contain air at normal atmospheric pressure, or is it vacuum?
The cylinder would have a vacuum inside it
 
daviddjh said:
The cylinder would have a vacuum inside it

OK - that makes it easy. Boyle's Law, ##PV=c## where ##c## is a constant, will get you an answer in short order.

(Boyle's Law would still get you there if the cylinder weren't a vacuum, but it would be more work).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top