Probabilty an event will occur

  • Thread starter Thread starter cpscdave
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of an event occurring based on its average frequency of once every ten days. The initial approach involves determining the probability of the event happening on a specific day and over multiple days. It is confirmed that the analysis is correct, with a suggestion to simplify calculations by using the complement method. For instance, the probability of the event occurring within two days can be calculated as one minus the probability of it not occurring in that timeframe. This method can be extended to calculate probabilities over longer periods, making it more efficient.
cpscdave
Messages
402
Reaction score
120
Can someone confirm if I'm going about this the right way

If I have an event that on average has occurred once every 10 days.
The probablity of that event occurring on any given day is 1/10
so then the probabilty the event occur tommorow 1/10
the probabilty the event will occur within the next 2 days is:
(1-1/10)*1/10+1/10
Pobabilty the event didnt occur on the first day but on the second plus the probabilty the event occurred on the first day.
And so on for 3 days, 4 days etc etc etc

Thanks!
-Dave
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Assuming the events occur independently of each other (for example, if it happens it is just as likely to happen again tomorrow as usual), then I think your analysis is sound.

Notice you could solve that 2 day problem slightly easier (which makes solving. e.g. the 8 day problem much easier). The probability that it occurs in the next two days is one minus the probability it does not occur. The probability it does not occur in either of the next two days is simply (9/10)2, so the probability it occurs at least once in the next two days is 1-(9/10)2. Not too helpful for in the next two days, but if someone wanted you to find the probability the event occurs in the next 14 days, for example, then this would make your expression a lot simpler.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top