How Do Accelerations and Angular Acceleration Relate in a Disk and Mass System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a disk of mass M and radius R unwinding from a tape, with a mass m suspended from the other end of the tape. The problem requires relating the linear accelerations of the mass and the disk to the angular acceleration of the disk as it drops vertically.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the linear accelerations of the disk and the mass, questioning the signs and definitions of positive directions for each variable. They discuss the implications of different assumptions about the direction of rotation and the acceleration relationships.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables, with some participants suggesting the use of additional constraints related to the length of the tape. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being examined, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the correct expressions or relationships yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly defining the directions of acceleration and rotation, as well as the potential confusion arising from the relationships between the variables. The discussion also references a clue from the textbook that seems to conflict with the derived equations, adding to the complexity of the problem.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


A disk of mass M and radius R unwinds from a tape wrapped around it. The tape passes over a frictionless pulley, and a mass m is suspended from the other end. Assume that the disk drops vertically.

a. Relate the accelerations of m and the disk, a and A, respectively to the angular acceleration of disk.

b. Find a, A and ##\alpha##.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Applying Newton's second law on disk: ##Mg-T=MA## where T is the tension in tape.

For m: ##mg-T=ma##. I still need one more equation.

I am not sure but do I have to equate the acceleration along string? For instance, the point in contact with disk has acceleration ##A-\alpha R##. Does this mean, ##a=A-\alpha R##?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 6.23.png
    6.23.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 762
Physics news on Phys.org
Pranav-Arora said:
Does this mean, ##a=A-\alpha R##?
That's about right, but be careful with the signs. Which way are you defining as positive for each variable?
 
haruspex said:
That's about right, but be careful with the signs. Which way are you defining as positive for each variable?

I am defining downward to be positive (the direction of g). But I still don't see why there is a sign error in my equation.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I am defining downward to be positive (the direction of g). But I still don't see why there is a sign error in my equation.
There's also the question of which direction of rotation is positive. Taking that to be clockwise in the diagram, I have no problem with the A-αR part. But remember that a is upwards on this side of the pulley. E.g. suppose A=0. A positive a for the descending mass should produce a positive α, but in your equation it gives negative α.
 
haruspex said:
There's also the question of which direction of rotation is positive. Taking that to be clockwise in the diagram, I have no problem with the A-αR part. But remember that a is upwards on this side of the pulley. E.g. suppose A=0. A positive a for the descending mass should produce a positive α, but in your equation it gives negative α.

So that means, ##a=-A+\alpha R##? This also looks incorrect to me. The clue for the answer states that if A=2a, then ##\alpha=3A/R## but if I substitute a=A/2, I get ##\alpha=3A/(2R)##. :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
So that means, ##a=-A+\alpha R##? ... if I substitute a=A/2, I get ##\alpha=3A/(2R)##.
That's not what I get with that substitution. You might be mixing up your A and a.
 
haruspex said:
That's not what I get with that substitution. You might be mixing up your A and a.

I don't see what I did wrong. Given clue: ##A=2a \Rightarrow a=A/2##. Plugging this in ##a=-A+\alpha R##, ##A/2=-A+\alpha R \Rightarrow 3A/2=\alpha R##. Is something wrong with my expression? I have tried to make the equations according to the diagram. Please tell me if something is unclear.
 
Try to use the length (or the change in length) of the tape for another constraint.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I don't see what I did wrong. Given clue: ##A=2a \Rightarrow a=A/2##. Plugging this in ##a=-A+\alpha R##, ##A/2=-A+\alpha R \Rightarrow 3A/2=\alpha R##. Is something wrong with my expression? I have tried to make the equations according to the diagram. Please tell me if something is unclear.

Oh, sorry - it's me that's getting my A and a confused. Anyway, I insist that A+a = αR. Consider two special case: if m is held still then a = 0 and A = αR; likewise if the centre of M is held fixed than A=0 and a = αR.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Oh, sorry - it's me that's getting my A and a confused. Anyway, I insist that A+a = αR. Consider two special case: if m is held still then a = 0 and A = αR; likewise if the centre of M is held fixed than A=0 and a = αR.

Umm...what do I have to do after considering these two cases? I still don't get the right ##\alpha## after substituting a=A/2. :rolleyes:
 
  • #11
Enigman said:
Try to use the length (or the change in length) of the tape for another constraint.

Let length be L(t)
##\frac{d^2 L}{dt^2}=?##
How does that ^ relate to α? What about a and A?
:zzz:need sleepzzz...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
Hi Pranav...

Please write down all the equations you have formed.Somehow I am not able to follow.
 
  • #13
Enigman said:
Let length be L(t)
##\frac{d^2 L}{dt^2}=?##
How does that ^ relate to α? What about a and A?
:zzz:need sleepzzz...


Hi Enigman! :smile:

I am honestly lost at finding out the expression for L(t).

Let ##L_0## be the initial length of tape. If the block moves down x and the disk moves down y, the new length of string is:

$$L(t)=L_0+x+y$$

Differentiating wrt time twice,

$$\frac{d^2L}{dt^2}=a+A-\alpha R$$.

What should I do with this? :confused:

Tanya Sharma said:
Hi Pranav...

Please write down all the equations you have formed.Somehow I am not able to follow.

Hi Tanya! :smile:

Here are the equations I wrote before this post:
For disk: ##Mg-T=MA##
For block: ##mg-T=ma##

Relating the accelerations: ##a=-A+\alpha R##.

The above equations are written with reference to the attached diagram in #1.
 
  • #14
Pranav-Arora said:
Hi Tanya! :smile:

Here are the equations I wrote before this post:
For disk: ##Mg-T=MA##
For block: ##mg-T=ma##

Relating the accelerations: ##a=-A+\alpha R##.

The above equations are written with reference to the attached diagram in #1.

Good...These are correct equations .Now what is the problem ?
 
  • #15
Tanya Sharma said:
Good...These are correct equations .Now what is the problem ?

The problem is that these equations do not satisfy the given clue for part a. I quote the clue from the book:

If ##A=2a##, then ##\alpha =3A/R##

What I have is ##a=-A+\alpha R##. Substituting a=A/2, ##\alpha = 3A/(2R)## which is incorrect. But if I substitute A=2a, I get ##\alpha =3a/R##. Error in the book I guess?
 
  • #16
Pranav-Arora said:
The problem is that these equations do not satisfy the given clue for part a. I quote the clue from the book:

What I have is ##a=-A+\alpha R##. Substituting a=A/2, ##\alpha = 3A/(2R)## which is incorrect. But if I substitute A=2a, I get ##\alpha =3a/R##. Error in the book I guess?

##\alpha =3a/R## is correct :approve:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #17
Thanks haruspex, Tanya and Engiman! :)

@Tanya: Can you please confirm if my expression for d^2L/dt^2 is correct? Also, what am I supposed to do with that? Equate it to zero?
 
  • #18
Pranav-Arora said:
@Tanya: Can you please confirm if my expression for d^2L/dt^2 is correct? Also, what am I supposed to do with that? Equate it to zero?

Why are you doing all this ? This isn't required .
 
  • #19
Tanya Sharma said:
Why are you doing all this ? This isn't required .

Since I have written it down, I would like to know if it's valid or not.
 
  • #20
Pranav-Arora said:
Since I have written it down, I would like to know if it's valid or not.

No...that's wrong .

What does the term d2L/dt2 represent ?
 
  • #21
Tanya Sharma said:
What does the term d2L/dt2 represent ?

The rate of change of rate of change of length of the tape. :-p

Honestly, I don't know how to interpret it. dL/dt is the rate at which the length of string changes. I don't see how should I interpret the second derivative. :(
 
  • #22
d2L/dt2 = αR

Now, L = L0+x+y

Differentiating twice, d2L/dt2 = a+A

and αR = a+A :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #23
Tanya Sharma said:
d2L/dt2 = αR

Now, L = L0+x+y

Differentiating twice, d2L/dt2 = a+A

and αR = a+A :smile:

Ah yes, thanks a lot Tanya! :smile:
 
  • #24
You are welcome :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K