[Gravity in general relativity] I dont understand this help

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of understanding gravity within the framework of general relativity, particularly how objects move in response to warped space-time. Participants express confusion over how an unmoving object begins to move toward another due to gravitational effects. It is clarified that gravity warps not just space but also time, influencing an object's trajectory through its world-line in space-time. The explanation emphasizes that even stationary objects are in motion through time, which affects their interaction with gravity. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of visualizing and comprehending the principles of general relativity.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Please view the following...

http://www.wimp.com/visualizegravity/

This is the way scientists try to explain the warping of space to explain gravity effects between to objects.

The very demonstration requires gravity to work! Why does one object track along the displaced track to begin with? Because gravity is drawing it downhill into the dimple. The dimple does cause a curved track but something else is causing the object to move within the influence of the dimple...gravity.

Let's say we place two Earth sized planets in space at, say, 300000 km apart. No movement relative to each other. Space time is distorted but so what. What causes one object to begin to be moved thru the curved distortion?

I can visualize how the 'track' of an already moving object will be curved by distortions as it travels. But I don't understand what would cause a 'relatively' unmoving object to 'want' to begin to move toward another?

With the video, Earth's gravity is pulling down on the balls causing them to accelerate downward into the fabric depression caused by the other object. In other words, gravity itself is necessary to explain gravity. This kind of visualization only makes me more confused.

Perhaps someone can help.

tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thetexan said:
What causes one object to begin to be moved thru the curved distortion?
You have to include the time dimension to describe that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4

thetexan said:
This kind of visualization only makes me more confused.
Yes, it's a very bad way to explain General Relativity.
 
Last edited:
thetexan said:
I can visualize how the 'track' of an already moving object will be curved by distortions as it travels. But I don't understand what would cause a 'relatively' unmoving object to 'want' to begin to move toward another?

Gravity warps space-time, not just space. You're always moving through space-time even when you're at rest because you're going to the future which means that you folow a line in space-time even when you're at rest that line is called the world-line. The warping of space-time forces the object that was initially at rest to start falling towards the Earth because that's the way it's world-line goes through the warped space-time. You have to keep in mind that relativity is a four-dimensional geometric theory.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Train Fall Paradox A train is running on a long bridge over a river. A series of bombs planted on the bridge by terrorists explode simultaneously, and the bridge collapses into dust in an instant. The train falls while keeping its cars in a horizontal line and hits the river. All the cars receive equal damage. However, in the inertial frame of reference in which the train had been at rest, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the bombs at the front explode earlier. The first car falls...