Writing Parametric Equations from Cartesian Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of converting Cartesian equations into parametric equations, particularly for complex functions where both x and y have indices. While simple cases like y=f(x) can be easily parameterized as x=t and y=f(t), more complicated equations, such as f(x,y)=0, require a more nuanced approach. The general method involves defining x and y in terms of a parameter t, such as x=g(t) and y=h(t), but the effectiveness of this parameterization depends on the specific function and its intended application. It is noted that while parameterization is always possible, it may not always be useful, emphasizing the importance of context. Overall, the conversation highlights the lack of standard methods for parameterizing Cartesian equations, suggesting that the approach varies based on the situation.
Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1
What is the general method for writing Cartesian equations as parametric equations?

For something as simple as y=f(x) we can write x=t and y=f(t) with the same function, but what about something more complicated, generally f(x,y)=0 - how can we make 2 parametric equations to represent a case where, for instance, both x and y have indices (neither 0 nor 1) in the Cartesian equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Big-Daddy said:
What is the general method for writing Cartesian equations as parametric equations?
I don't think there is one. There are lots of ways to parameterise a relation.

For something as simple as y=f(x) we can write x=t and y=f(t) with the same function, but what about something more complicated, generally f(x,y)=0 - how can we make 2 parametric equations to represent a case where, for instance, both x and y have indices (neither 0 nor 1) in the Cartesian equation?

put: x=g(t), y=h(t) then f(t)=f(g(t),h(t)) is the parameterization.

The details depend on the type of function and what you need the parameterization for.
 
Ok, firstly, is it always possible to write a couple of parametric equations x(t), y(t) for any Cartesian equation in x and y?

Could you provide some links on how to convert from Cartesian to parametric equations?
 
You can always parameterize a function but you cannot always do so usefully.
i.e. say that z=f(x,y) represents the height of a terrain above a reference level ... what would be a useful parameterisation?

Depends on what you want to do with it right?

Usually you start out by parameterizing curves.
You can think of the parameter as a time value and the parameterization is the way the position coordinate changes with time. The resulting equation traces out a trajectory.

Treatments are a bit tricky to find since there are no standard ways to go about it.

Paul's notes deal with parametric equations (1st link) and an application to line integrals (2nd link).
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParametricEqn.aspx
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/LineIntegralsPtI.aspx

The arc-length parameterization in some detail:
http://www.math.hmc.edu/math142-01/mellon/Differential_Geometry/Geometry_of_curves/Parametric_Curves_and_arc.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top