Why is this calculation of earth gravitational acceleration incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The equation a = v^2/R is indeed correct for calculating centripetal acceleration, and the calculated value of 0.03 m/s^2 for a person at the equator is accurate, though the units should be in m/s^2. However, this acceleration does not account for the gravitational force acting on the individual, which is countered by the ground's upward force. As a result, the effective weight of a person at the equator is slightly less than at the poles due to this centripetal effect. The discussion clarifies that the equation is valid, but additional forces must be considered to understand the overall acceleration experienced. Understanding these forces is crucial for accurate calculations of weight and acceleration on Earth.
Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I was taught:

a = {v^2 \over R}. I substitute v for the speed of the rotating Earth at the equator, and the radius, R = 6378m. And I get a = 0.03 \rm m/s^2.

It looks like the equation a = {v^2 \over R} may incorrect. Why am I taught this equation in University if it is false?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the correct equation for the centripetal acceleration of an object in uniform circular motion. The numeric result that you have calculated is correct for the centripetal acceleration of a man standing on the equator, although the units are off. It should be in m/s2.

But the gravity is not the only force acting on such a man. The ground is also pushing upwards against the soles of his shoes. It is the difference between the upward force of the ground on his shoes and the downward force of gravity on his body that accounts for the residual 0.03 m/sec2 acceleration
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hello Marius! :smile:

v2/r is the centripetal acceleration at the equator

if the Earth had no gravity, it is the tension in the string (divided by m) that would be needed to keep you on the ground at the equator

for that reason, although your weight at the poles is mg, your weight at the equator (as measured by standing on a scale) is less than mg by a very small amount, mv2/r :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks!M
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top