Pertubations To Helmholtz Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding resources for solving the Helmholtz equations with a perturbation term p(r), specifically in the context of wave equations. Participants express difficulty locating information that addresses p(r) as a non-zero term, as most resources only cover the case where p(r) equals zero. Additionally, there is a request for information on wave equations with perturbations, which are relevant in applications like waveguide optics. A reference to "Kumar's method (perturbation method)" is suggested as a potential resource. The conversation highlights a need for more comprehensive materials on these specific mathematical topics.
gysush
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Consider the Helmholtz Equations with a perturbation p(r)

[gradient^2 + p(r) + omega^2/c(r)^2 ]u(r,w) = 0

Does anyone know where I can find resources to the solutions/discussion of this equation? I can find many things such that p(r) = 0 , but the RHS = forcing function, but that is not what I want.

Likewise, any resources pertaining to the wave equation with a perturbation would also be nice

[gradient^2 + p(r) - 1/c(r)^2 * del^2/delT^2]u(r,t) = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top