Mobius Band as a Quotient Topology

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Martin Crossley's book, Essential Topology.

I am at present studying Example 5.55 regarding the Mobius Band as a quotient topology.

Example 5.55 Is related to Examples 5.53 and 5.54. So I now present these Examples as follows:

attachment.php?attachmentid=68070&stc=1&d=1395984295.jpg
I cannot follow the relation (x,y) \sim (x', y') \Longleftrightarrow \text{ either } (x,y) = (x', y') \text{ or } x = 1 - x' \text{ and } y - y' = \pm 1Why do we need (x,y) = (x', y') in the relation? Indeed, why do we need y - y' = \pm 1?Surely all we need is (x,y) \sim (x', y') \Longleftrightarrow x = 1 - x' \text{ and } y - y' = -1Can anyone explain how the relation (x,y) \sim (x', y') \Longleftrightarrow \text{ either } (x,y) = (x', y') \text{ or } x = 1 - x' \text{ and } y - y' = \pm 1 actually works to produce the Mobius Band?Peter
 

Attachments

  • EX 5.5 & Previous Examples.jpg
    EX 5.5 & Previous Examples.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 1,224
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
I cannot follow the relation (x,y) \sim (x', y') \Longleftrightarrow \text{ either } (x,y) = (x', y') \text{ or } x = 1 - x' \text{ and } y - y' = \pm 1Why do we need (x,y) = (x', y') in the relation? Indeed, why do we need y - y' = \pm 1?Surely all we need is (x,y) \sim (x', y') \Longleftrightarrow x = 1 - x' \text{ and } y - y' = -1Can anyone explain how the relation (x,y) \sim (x', y') \Longleftrightarrow \text{ either } (x,y) = (x', y') \text{ or } x = 1 - x' \text{ and } y - y' = \pm 1 actually works to produce the Mobius Band?Peter
Well, it's an equivalence relation, so it has to be reflexive by definition. Thus, if ##(x,y)=(x',y')##, then we must have ##(x,y)\sim(x',y')##.

Equivalence relations are symmetric as well, so if ##(x,y)\sim(x',y')##, then we must have ##(x',y')\sim(x,y)##. If ##y-y'=1##, then ##y'-y=-1##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top