What is Hermitian? Definition & Summary

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian
AI Thread Summary
The Hermitian transpose, or Hermitian conjugate, of a matrix is defined as the complex conjugate of its transpose. A matrix is classified as Hermitian if it equals its own Hermitian transpose, which is crucial in quantum mechanics where observables are represented by Hermitian operators. The discussion highlights key equations demonstrating the properties of Hermitian operators, including their role in ensuring real expectation values in quantum mechanics. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of these operators in proving uncertainty relations. The title of the discussion is noted to be grammatically incorrect, suggesting a revision for clarity.
Messages
19,790
Reaction score
10,746
Definition/Summary

The Hermitian transpose or Hermitian conjugate (or conjugate transpose) M^{\dagger} of a matrix M is the complex conjugate of its transpose M^T.

A matrix is Hermitian if it is its own Hermitian transpose: M^{\dagger}\ =\ M.

An operator A is Hermitian (or self-adjoint) if it is its own adjoint: \langle Ax|y\rangle\ =\ \langle x|Ay\rangle (in the finite-dimensional case, that means that its matrix is Hermitian).

In quantum theory, an observable must be represented by a Hermitian operator (on a Hilbert space).

For other uses of the adjective "Hermitian", see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian.

Equations

\int \psi _1 ^* (\hat{O} \psi _2 ) \, dx = \int (\hat{O}\psi _1 )^* \psi _2 \, dx

\langle b |\hat{O} |c \rangle = \langle c |\hat{O} |b \rangle ^*

Extended explanation

A matrix M is hermitian if:
M^{\dagger} = (M^T)^* = M ,
where \dagger is called the hermitian conjugate, and is thus a combination of matrix transpose and complex conjugation of each entry in the matrix.

In quantum mechanics, observable quantities are assigned by hermitian operators. Examples of those are:

(with continuous spectrum)
position operator
\hat{x},

momentum operator
-i\hbar \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x},

(with discrete spectrum)
z-component of angular momentum operator
\hat{L}_z .

In terms of wave functions, an operator \hat{O} is hermitian if:
\int \psi _1 ^* (\hat{O} \psi _2 ) \, dx = \int (\hat{O}\psi _1 )^* \psi _2 \, dx

In terms of bra-ket:
\langle b |\hat{O} |c \rangle = \langle c |\hat{O} |b \rangle

Now, using the wave function formalism, some valuable identities will be presented:

Let us consider two hermitian operators \hat{A} and \hat{B}.

The expectation value:
<\hat{A}> = \int \psi ^* (\hat{A} \psi ) dx = \int (\hat{A}\psi )^* \psi dx,
is real, proof:
<\hat{A}>^* = \int ((\hat{A}\psi)^*\psi)^* dx = \int (\hat{A}\psi)\psi^* dx = \int \psi^* (\hat{A}\psi) dx = <\hat{A}>
Since \hat{A} was said to be hermitian, and \psi _1 = \psi _2 when we do expectation values.

Expectation value of \hat{A}^2:
<\hat{A}^2> = \int \psi ^* (\hat{A}(\hat{A}\psi)) dx = \int \psi^* (\hat{A}\tilde{\psi})dx =
(\tilde{\psi} = \hat{A}\psi \: \text{ is a new wavefunction} )
\int (\hat{A}\psi)^*\tilde{\psi}dx = \int (\hat{A}\psi)^*(\hat{A}\psi) dx

Now we can show another useful result:
\int \psi^* (\hat{A}(\hat{B}\psi))dx = \int(\psi^*(\hat{B}(\hat{A}\psi)))^*dx ,
prove this as an exercise.

Two more useful things:
I = \int \psi^*(\hat{A}\hat{B}+\hat{B}\hat{A})\psi = I^*
is real, show this as an exercise.

The operators always to the right if not indicated otherwise. Thus:
I = \int \psi^*(\hat{A}(\hat{B}\psi))dx + \int \psi^* (\hat{B}(\hat{A}\psi)) dx

J = \int \psi^*(\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A})\psi = -J^*
is imaginary, show this as an exercise.

These identities are needed to prove the uncertainty relations of quantum mechanics.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"What is a Hermitian" - this doesn't seem right grammatically. Hermitian is an adjective, unlike Hamiltonian, which is a noun. A better title for the future insight article would be "What is Hermitian Conjugate?"

(You can delete this post once you update the title, as this would then become useless.)
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top