Can the universe be both infinite AND expanding

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept that the universe can be both infinite and expanding without contradiction. It posits that while the universe may have been infinite in the past, it continues to expand, causing local density to decrease. The idea suggests that the universe can have a flat local curvature while being globally infinite, where "stretching" occurs without an increase in total size. Evidence for a finite universe could include observable patterns in the sky or specific geometric measurements. Currently, the prevailing view supports the notion that expanding space can indeed be infinite in volume.
Silvers931
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I was researching the inflationary model of the universe and came across the idea that the universe may be both infinite and expanding; and that there isn't a contradiction. As time goes by, the amount of matter in any given area will become less dense due to the metric expansion of space itself. If It was infinite a billion years ago, it is still infinite now, but our finite neighborhood takes up more space in that infinite universe.

This would explain why ALL measurements yield a universe with flat curvature; because since the universe has an infinite volume any arbitrary measurement will yield a 0 curvature. My question is this; Can the topology of the universe be infinite in size, flat locally, and have a curvature globally such that the "infinite" universe is simply stretching and not necessary growing in total size.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Silvers931 said:
This would explain why ALL measurements yield a universe with flat curvature; because since the universe has an infinite volume any arbitrary measurement will yield a 0 curvature.
Why? There are infinite negatively curved spaces.

My question is this; Can the topology of the universe be infinite in size, flat locally, and have a curvature globally such that the "infinite" universe is simply stretching and not necessary growing in total size.
If the universe is infinite, then it is not growing in size.
 
Silvers931 said:
... My question is this; Can ... the universe be infinite in size, flat locally, and ...such that the "infinite" universe is simply stretching and not necessary growing in total size.
I think the short answer to that question is YES. For the reason that Brian Powell gave:
bapowell said:
...If the universe is infinite, then it is not growing in size.

If I understand the core of your question, you put it concisely in the title: Can the universe be both infinite AND expanding?

It certainly can be! as far as we know. There is no clear evidence that it is finite. So we have to allow that it might be infinite. And it certainly is expanding!

By expanding I simply mean what you called "stretching", percentage growth of distances between widely separated objects.
If the U is spatially infinite then space doesn't have any definite size, so we can't talk about the size of the universe increasing. But distances between objects can be growing at a regular percentage rate (as long as the objects are not part of the same cluster held together by its own gravity, they have to be separated enough to participate in the pattern of distance expansion).

What would be evidence of spatial finiteness? Some pattern in the deep sky which repeats? Some pattern that is the same coming from two opposing directions? A very accurate measurement of angles showing that with a big enough triangle they add up to more than 180 degrees? (Like on the surface of the Earth large geodesic triangles can add up to more. E.g. a segment of the equator for base, and vertex at the north pole.) Someday humanity may discover evidence of spatial finiteness, but for now we have to accept the possibility that expanding space might be infinite in volume and have no definite size.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top