How is Nonstandard Analysis Applied in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Physics
Click For Summary
Nonstandard analysis (NSA), developed by Abraham Robinson in the 1960s, introduces hyperreal numbers to incorporate genuine infinitesimals, which are crucial in various mathematical fields. While NSA has applications in areas like differential equations and probability theory, its direct applications in mathematical physics remain uncertain. Some argue that NSA could provide clearer and more intuitive descriptions of physical phenomena, especially since infinitesimals are already used in heuristic reasoning. However, it is noted that all results achievable through NSA can also be derived using standard analysis, limiting its novelty in proving new concepts. The ongoing exploration of NSA's potential in physics suggests that its role may evolve over time.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Here's what mathworld has to say on nonstandard analysis:

"Nonstandard analysis is a branch of mathematical logic which introduces hyperreal numbers to allow for the existence of "genuine infinitesimals," which are numbers that are less than 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ..., but greater than 0. Abraham Robinson developed nonstandard analysis in the 1960s. The theory has since been investigated for its own sake and has been applied in areas such as Banach spaces, differential equations, probability theory, mathematical economics, and mathematical physics. [...]"

Does anyone know what the applications to mathematical physics are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To the best of my knowledge,None, at this point in time. There was also a time when physics had no need for matrix theory and Riemann geometry, so things can change.
 
Well, everything that can be done with Nonstandard Analysis can be done with standard analysis, so you can't prove new things...

the general assertion is that NSA is more intuitive, and proofs using it are shorter and clearer.

I believe for physics, the hope is that the description of things with infinitessimals will be clearer than the way they are now. Especially since infinitessimals are already used in heuristic reasoning -- the translation to rigor should be easier.
 
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
276
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K