Can a 'Good Surface' Be Found for Any Continuous Vector Field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of identifying a 'good surface' for any continuous vector field, specifically in relation to a vector field represented as F' = r r'. The poster describes a scenario involving a spherical Gaussian surface and the relationship between the electric field and the surface area. The main question posed is whether a 'good surface' can be found for any continuous vector field and how to determine such a surface that encloses a given point. Suggestions include exploring conservative vector fields and equipotential surfaces, which are defined by a scalar potential function. The conversation also touches on the use of LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
HungryChemist
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I am terribly sorry for not being able to write this simple equation in Latex form. (I will be really glad if someone can tell me where I can learn how to use Latex to write math symbol)

Let F' be a vector field given by F' = r r' (r' = radial unit vector) and also let p be a point on the space R distance away. Then one can imagine a sphere of radius of R (centered at origin). Now, every patch of this surface has normal vector n' that is in the same direction as F' at that point.

I hope I am being clear, the more specific example of above kind would be an electric field due to a single positive charge and gaussian surface(shperical) such that E dot dA will simply come out as magnitue of E times magnitude of dA. If the gaussian surface wasn't sphere former is not true. So let me call such surface a 'good surface'.

Now my question is...

Shouldn't there be such 'good surface' for any vector field that is continuous everywhere? If so how can one show it? Also how can one devise a methord of finding such surface that encloses point in question? In other words, given vector field and a point in that vector space, find the good ' surface'

Please, help me out carrying this utterly confused process...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tex tags. [ tex ]mathstuff[ /tex ] without the spaces.
 
You want to find surfaces on which the vector field is everywhere perpendicular? Look up "conservative vector fields," and "equipotentials". The principle is that vector fields with the property you want uniquely define a scalar potential function, and its equipotential surfaces are everywhere normal to the vector field.

As for using TeX on the Physics Forum, the introduction is located here .
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top