Explaining Thin Films and the Reflection of Light in Air-Film Interface

  • Thread starter Thread starter dekoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thin films
AI Thread Summary
In thin film optics, light reflecting off a higher refractive index medium undergoes a 180-degree phase shift, while light reflecting off a lower refractive index medium does not. When light enters a film from air, part of it reflects off the film's surface, resulting in a phase shift, while the remaining light transmits through to the air-film boundary, where it reflects without a phase shift. This behavior is explained by the refractive indices of the materials involved, with the phase change being 180 degrees when transitioning from a lower to a higher index. The discussion also touches on how this phenomenon can be understood through both classical wave mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping thin film interference effects.
dekoi
This is not a textbook question. It is strictly some concepts which I am confused about.


Suppose we have thin film situation.

|||||||||||||||||||AIR|||||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
|||||||||||||||||||FILM|||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
|||||||||||||||||||AIR|||||||||||||||||||

The ray enters the air from the top. Part of it will be reflected from the surface of the film (it has a higher index of refraction). The ray will reflect 180 degrees and thus be 180 degrees out of phase, assuming that the incident ray was normal to surface.

Part of it will also pass through the air/film barrier. According to my professor, the ray will reflect of the film/air barrier, and then be 0 degrees out of phase. This is beyond me! How come the ray reflects of the boundary between film and air? Should it not pass through it without reflection? Also, why would the phase be 0?


In another situation:
|||||||||||||||||||AIR|||||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
|||||||||||||||||||FILM|||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
||||||||||DIAMOND (highest n)|||||||||||

The second reflected ray is said to be 180 degrees out of phase. Once again, why?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?/0
 
dekoi said:
The ray enters the air from the top. Part of it will be reflected from the surface of the film (it has a higher index of refraction). The ray will reflect 180 degrees and thus be 180 degrees out of phase, assuming that the incident ray was normal to surface.

This has a problem: the reflected ray will reflect according to the law of reflection and take off an an angle equal to the incoming ray. The 180 degree out-of-phase means that the reflected wave is simply inverted. Look at a regular sine wave; if you flip the wave upside-down, notice that the crest has become a trough, and the trough becomes a crest. A full wavelength is chopped up into 360 "degrees" just like a circle; so the "distance" from a crest to a trough, is half a wavelength, or 180 degrees. Thus, the wave has shifted its phase by 180 degrees.

Exactly why light waves invert when reflecting from a fast-to-slow interface but not when reflecting from a slow-to-fast interface is not an easy explanation. You can check out the mechanical wave analogy, but the real answer lies in quantum electrodynamics ("QED").

Part of it will also pass through the air/film barrier. According to my professor, the ray will reflect of the film/air barrier, and then be 0 degrees out of phase. This is beyond me! How come the ray reflects of the boundary between film and air? Should it not pass through it without reflection?

All waves will partially reflect and partially transmit (refract) when they hit an interface of two media. The exception is for monochromatic light sources in special situations, such as what you are learning now.

The "mechanical wave" explanation says that in thin film interference, the two rays that reflect (one internally and one externally) come back together out of phase and mutually destruct, causing no wave of that frequency to emerge. But the weird thing is even if you fire one photon at a time, not one single photon will reflect in that situation even if there is nothing to interfere with. Bizarre! but true. QED.
 
dekoi said:
This is not a textbook question. It is strictly some concepts which I am confused about.
Suppose we have thin film situation.
|||||||||||||||||||AIR|||||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
|||||||||||||||||||FILM|||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
|||||||||||||||||||AIR|||||||||||||||||||
The ray enters the air from the top. Part of it will be reflected from the surface of the film (it has a higher index of refraction). The ray will reflect 180 degrees and thus be 180 degrees out of phase, assuming that the incident ray was normal to surface.
Part of it will also pass through the air/film barrier. According to my professor, the ray will reflect of the film/air barrier, and then be 0 degrees out of phase. This is beyond me! How come the ray reflects of the boundary between film and air? Should it not pass through it without reflection? Also, why would the phase be 0?
In another situation:
|||||||||||||||||||AIR|||||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
|||||||||||||||||||FILM|||||||||||||||||
-----------------------------------------
||||||||||DIAMOND (highest n)|||||||||||
The second reflected ray is said to be 180 degrees out of phase. Once again, why?!
When the light incides at the boundary of a two different materials part of it is reflected and the other part enters into the new medium, (it is called transmitted light) but will travell in different direction (it is refracted).

The laws for light reflection and refraction at a boundary between different media can be derived from Maxwell's equations of electrodynamics, and these laws state that both the magnitude and phase of the reflected and transmitted waves are connected to the refractive indices of those media.

In introductory Physics, it is enough to know that the phase change is 180 degree if the light ray incides from a medium of lower refractive index onto the surface of a medium of higher refractive index, and it is zero in the opposite case. Sometimes people call the refractive index "optical density" and say that the light reflects from an optically denser medium "out of phase" and in phase from an optically less dense one. The phenomenon is similar you experience with a wave traveling along a string: The wave turns over from fixed end and comes back in-phase from a loose end.
Air has the lowest refractive index in your problems, and diamond has the highest. The refractive index of the film is between the other two. So the phase change of the reflected wave is 180 degrees when the light goes from air to film. The other part of the light which has not ben reflected goes through the film and reaches the boundary of the film with air. Here again, it is partly reflected and partly transmitted, and the reflected wave is in-phase now, as it is directed from a high-optical density medium to a low one.
On the same way, the reflected wave is out-of phase when the light enters to diamond from the film.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top