What is the formal definition of a limit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathshead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Format Limit
AI Thread Summary
The formal definition of a limit states that the limit of a function f(x) as x approaches a value a equals L if, for every epsilon greater than 0, there exists a corresponding delta greater than 0 such that for all x, if 0 < |x-a| < delta, then |f(x) - L| < epsilon. An example provided demonstrates this by showing that the limit of 5x - 3 as x approaches 1 is 2, using the relationship between epsilon and delta to establish the proof. The discussion emphasizes that this definition, while complex, ensures that f(x) can be made arbitrarily close to L within a specified range. Understanding limits in this way highlights the concept of controlling the error margin in function outputs. This foundational principle is crucial for further studies in calculus and mathematical analysis.
mathshead
can someone explain what the formal difinition of a limit ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
n -> [oo] An < +/- [oo]
 
the limit as x tends to a of f(x) equals L if;

for every number epsilon (usually, can't find the symbol) > 0, there is a corresponding number [sig] > 0, such that for all x;

0 < |x-a| < [sig] ==> |f(x) - L| < epsilon.

Is the formal definition.
for example (easy one);
To show that the limit of 5x - 3 as x tends to 1 is actually 2;

so a = 1, L = 2 (since this is what it does appear to converge to). Need
0 < |x-1| < [sig] for any epsilon > 0.

f(x) is within epsilon of L ie. |f(x) - 2| < epsilon. So to find [sig] from this,

|(5x-3) - 2| = |5x - 5| < epsilon
5|x - 1| < epsilon
|x - 1| < epsilon / 5.

so [sig] = epsilon / 5

and from 0 < |x - 1| < [sig] = epsilon / 5,

|(5x - 3) - 2| = 5 |x - 1| < 5 (epsilon / 5) = epsilon.

Which proves that L = 2.

Alternatively find a good textbook :wink:
 
The limit definition looks rather convulated when stated in terms of epsilons and deltas. One good way of thinking about it is this:

Given any allowable magnitude of error (formally epsilon) from a value (the limit), there exists a range near c (the value x is approaching) for which the function's outputs ( f(x) ) will deviate from the limit no more than the given magnitude of error (epsilon).

The key here is that if the limit for f(x) at a particular point c exists (and hence the previous statement holds), then we are stating that we can get f(x) as close to L as we want. I can make it within .001 or .000001, ... anything (because for each error I present to it, the limit existing garuntees that i can find an interval of values for x symmetrically about c such that f(x) will be that close to L).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top