Mohr-Coulomb Theory: Overview & Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
AI Thread Summary
The Mohr-Coulomb theory is a critical model for understanding the plasticity of materials like soil and rock, incorporating both frictional and dilatational effects. It addresses limitations of standard J2 - von Mises yield criteria, which often fail to account for pressure sensitivity in plastic deformation. The yield condition in Mohr-Coulomb theory states that yielding occurs when a specific combination of shear stress and mean normal stress is reached, defined by the equation τ = c - μσ. This model is visualized as a wedge-shaped yield surface, reflecting the angle of internal friction and its dependency on mean normal stress. The Drucker-Prager model is noted as a more effective alternative in numerical applications due to its improved behavior.
Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
What is the Mohr-Coulomb theory? Can you tell me a bit about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you referring to the frictional plasticity theory ?
 
I think so, yes.
 
About the model in general ... if you've some specifics in mind "shoot"...

For materials like soil, rock etc. frictional and dilatational effects need to be incorporated in the constitutive modeling (think about deformation of concrete intuitively as an example, the role of friction in the plasticity response is somewhat easy to "visualize"). Standard J2 - von Mises type of yield criterion & flow rule & evolution equation don't generally produce decent results when applied to such materials, when they neglect both frictional and pressure sensitive (dilatational) effects to plastic deformation.

So, in order to get rid of this handicap pressure dependent material models for plasticity have been developed. The yielding conditions for example have frictional resistance term(s), in the Mohr-Coulomb case the yield condition states that yielding occurs when a critical combination of shear stress and mean normal stress are reached on any plane, the criterion written as - for the magnitude of the shear stress for yield
<br /> \tau=c-\mu\sigma<br />
\sigma is the normal stress on a plane, c is the cohesion shear stress, and the "coefficient of internal friction" is defined via an angle of internal friction (-> next sentence). Essentially you can understand the yield criterion being wedge shaped (its cross-section) with an angle identified with the friction coefficient (when viewed in a plane) as a function of mean normal stress (a dependency standard von Mises for example doesn't have). A related, and a "better behaving" model is the Drucker-Prager model (similar analogy in the shape of the yield surface as between Tresca and von Mises models) - which for this reason have usually used in numerical work.

A pretty 'solid' presentation:
http://www.granular-volcano-group.org/frictional_theory.html#II .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top