What is the time evolution of the wave function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Panic Attack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the time evolution of the wave function for a particle in a one-dimensional box, specifically focusing on finding eigenfunctions and eigenvalues. The wave function is initially expressed as a combination of eigenstates U_2(x) and U_3(x). A key point raised is the importance of correctly applying boundary conditions, leading to the conclusion that kL = nπ, which helps derive the energy levels En. The conversation also touches on using the Evolution Operator for simplifying the time evolution problem, although the original poster successfully solved it through the Schrödinger equation. The participants express appreciation for the assistance provided in normalizing the wave function and resolving the issues encountered.
Panic Attack
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Ok, I have a 1-D box confined at at x = 0 and x = L. So, points between 0 and L distances are the continuum state and otherwise distances be discontinous.
a) I need to find the egien functs: Un(x) and related egien values: En ... n are the excited levels represented as postive whole numbers.

The wave funct is: φ(x, t = 0) = (1/(3^1/2))U_2(x) + ((2/3)^1/2)U_3(x)


b) As time progresses, what will the function look like?
c) What is the prob. density (φ squared) and P(x,t) = total probability.


What I have so far...

(-(h/2pi)^2)/2m * (d^2/dx^2)Psi(x) = E*Psi(x)
Psi(x)|x=0 = Asin(0) + Bcos(0) = B = 0 ?
Psi(x)|x=L = Asin(kL) + Bcos(kL) = 0 ?

[0 0; sin(kL) cos(kL)] *[A;B] = [0 0]

set KnL/2 = n*pi
En = (h/2pi)^2 *k^2]/2m
= [(h/2pi)^2] /2m * (2n*pi/L)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/21538

Nobody wants to help Adam...
 
Hi Panic_Attack!

In the second boundary condition you made a mistake, because you
already know that B=0, You really have:

\Psi(x=L) = ASin(kL) = 0

And this condition say to you:

kL = n\pi

where

k^{2}\equiv\frac{2mE}{\hbar^{2}}

Then you got E_{n}

To find the wave function you don't know A yet, but try to normalize the wave function.

On (b) part.. Have you heard about the Evolution Operator? Maybe this simplify your problem.

(Sorry my english sucks)
 
Last edited:
criz.corral said:
Hi Panic_Attack!

In the second boundary condition you made a mistake, because you
already know that B=0, You really have:

\Psi(x=L) = ASin(kL) = 0

And this condition say to you:

kL = n\pi

where

k^{2}\equiv\frac{2mE}{\hbar^{2}}

Then you got E_{n}

To find the wave function you don't know A yet, but try to normalize the wave function.

On (b) part.. Have you heard about the Evolution Operator? Maybe this simplify your problem.

(Sorry my english sucks)

Thanks so much for replying to my question. Fortunately I was able to find an answer without using the evolution operator. I basically went through solving with the schrodinger equation with setting up the solutions of the differential equations based on the regions. And had the same K value you got too. Then I normalised the wave function with it squared over the integral and found A too... I really apreciate your help, sorry I couldn't reply sooner.

Your english sounds better than mine! lol
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top