1 Dimensional Kinematics Problem

AI Thread Summary
A user sought help with a kinematics problem involving a car accelerating at 6.0 m/s² and a truck moving at a constant speed of 21 m/s. The key to solving the problem was to set the distances traveled by both vehicles equal at the moment the car overtakes the truck. After receiving guidance, the user successfully calculated the time to overtake as 7 seconds, the distance traveled as 147 meters, and the car's speed at that point as 42 m/s. The discussion emphasized the importance of using algebraic methods rather than iterative guessing to find the solution. Overall, the user was able to resolve the problem with clearer steps and verification.
Skizye
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've been stuck on this problem for a bit and I am not really sure how to go about solving it.

Homework Statement



As a traffic light turns green, a waiting car starts with a constant acceleration of 6.0 m/s². At the instant the car begins to accelerate, a truck with a constant velocity of 21 m/s passes in the next lane.
a. How far will the car travel before it overtakes the truck?
b. How fast will the car be traveling when it overtakes the truck?

Homework Equations



So far, all we have been working with in class are these:

v = v_0 + a t
v^2 = v_0^2 + 2 a (x - x_0)
x = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2)a t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried several different angles for this problem, but so far I haven't been able to solve for any of the variables besides the ones given in the problem.
I set up my variable table

Car
v =
v_0 = 0 m/s
x - x_0 = ___
a = 6.0 m/s²
t =

Truck
v = 21 m/s
v_0 = 21 m/s
x - x_0 = ___
a = 0 m/s
t =

I tried guessing and checking numbers for t but that is probably not the cleanest way to solve this problem, if it's even possible to do at all. I'm not really sure how to solve for any of the variables here, any help would be appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Skizye,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

You need to show your work before we can help you. But if you absolutely can't get started, here is a quick hint: At the moment the car overtakes the truck, both the car and the truck have traveled an equal distance (as in "=" distance :wink:).
 
Thanks, collinsmark! I figured it out with your hint by plugging in different times to the formula until their distances were equal. I'll be sure and post all of my work next time! =]
 
Skizye said:
Thanks, collinsmark! I figured it out with your hint by plugging in different times to the formula until their distances were equal. I'll be sure and post all of my work next time! =]

Okay, but I'm not sure I agree with your approach. http://www.websmileys.com/sm/sad/021.gif. Such physics problems are not supposed to be solved iteratively.

What I was hinting at was something like this (this is one of a few ways to solve this problem, btw):

(i) Find an equation for the truck's distance, as a function of time t.
(ii) Find an equation for the car's distance, as a function of time t.
(iii) Set the above two equations equal to each other and solve for t. (You can do this because at the moment that the car overtakes the truck, the distances are equal. You are solving for the specific time that the distances are equal.) [Edit: But don't do this step iteratively, instead use algebra!]

(iv) Plop that t value you just found into the equation for the car's distance, and solve for the car's distance. That's the answer to part a.
(v) To double check your answer, substitute that same t value into into the truck's equation for distance, and calculate the distance. If things work out, both distances will be the same.
 
Last edited:
That's a lot easier and cleaner than what I did.
I wound up with a time of 7 s, distance of 147 m, and velocity of 42 m/s. Does that sound about right?
 
Skizye said:
That's a lot easier and cleaner than what I did.
I wound up with a time of 7 s, distance of 147 m, and velocity of 42 m/s. Does that sound about right?
'Looks good to me! :approve:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top