Is G3P the Same as Pyruvate in Cellular Processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology
AI Thread Summary
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P) and pyruvate are distinct molecules involved in different stages of cellular metabolism. G3P is produced during the Calvin Cycle in photosynthesis, while pyruvate is formed during glycolysis as glucose is broken down. The conversion process involves several steps where G3P can ultimately be transformed into pyruvate through enzymatic reactions. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping metabolic pathways. G3P and pyruvate serve different roles in cellular processes.
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,650
Reaction score
39
I am reading about the Calvin Cycle in Photosynthesis. My book says that the Calvin Cycle constructs a 3 carbon sugar called glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P) and then it says "You already met G3P in glycolysis. It is the three-carbon sugar formed by the splitting of glucose."

So I'm thinking, wait a minute, that's pyruvate. Are G3P and pyruvate two words for the same thing or is there a difference in the molecules?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G3P is not pyruvate
After glucose is mobolized by adding phosphate groups and turned into fructosebisphosphate, it is cleaved into dihydroxyacetone phosphate and phosphoglyceraldehyde. Then dihydroxyacetone phosphate is also converted into phosphoglyceraldehyde. The two phosphoglyceraldehyde is then converted to G3P. Through a series of chemical enzymes, G3P is converted into Pyruvate.
 
Thanks very much! And it was very kind of you to provide me with the full explanation!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top