Black Holes in a Newtonian (non-Einsteinian) World

AI Thread Summary
In a Newtonian universe, objects can theoretically exceed the speed of light, which eliminates the concept of an event horizon associated with black holes. Instead, gravity could become so strong that it overwhelms other forces, leading to a collapse into a singularity, termed a naked singularity, without an event horizon. This scenario suggests that Newtonian mechanics breaks down under such extreme conditions, necessitating the framework of General Relativity for accurate descriptions. The discussion highlights the limitations of Newtonian physics in explaining phenomena related to black holes. Understanding these concepts requires a grasp of both calculus and the fundamental principles of gravity and relativity.
Izzhov
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
I'm just wondering... how would this work out? What would happen, for example, if an object goes past the event horizon of a black hole in a Newtonian universe? Or is this where Newtonian mechanics breaks down and we need General Relativity to explain it?

(P.S. I am a high school student with average knowledge of Newtonian Mechanics and minimal knowledge of the Theory of Relativity, so I might find some/a lot of the explanation to be confusing. I do, however, understand most math calculus and below.)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi, (correct me if I am wrong, people)
The event horison is defined by the radius at which the escape velocity exceeds the speed of light, which is the greatest possible speed according to relativity. So, nothing, not even light, can escape and nothing inside can affect the outside

In a Newtonian universe things can theoretically travel faster than light so there is no event horison.

However, in a Newtonian world objects could still be massive enough that gravity would overwealm all other forces (eg the forces that keep neutrons apart etc) and it would collapse to an infinitely small speck. I think this would be called a naked singularity because there is no event horison to isolate us from this total failure of physics.
 
Last edited:
You may wish to look for information on John Michell or Laplace's dark star.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top