19F-NMR Spectra Recording with Trifluoroacetic Acid Reference

AI Thread Summary
A discussion revolves around the challenges of recording 19F-NMR spectra for a synthesized compound with pentafluorophenyl groups. The operator lacks experience with 19F-NMR, leading to difficulties in using reference materials. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is suggested as a reference, with instructions provided for using it as an external reference by taking its spectrum first and setting the reference point at -78.5 ppm. However, it is noted that TFA may not be ideal for internal referencing due to its reactivity. An alternative recommendation is to use FCCl3 as an internal standard, which has a chemical shift of 0 ppm and is inert, making it easier to handle. The discussion also highlights the complexity of interpreting C13 spectra due to F19-C13 coupling, which can create unexpected peak patterns. Additionally, questions arise about temperature effects on peak resolution in 19F-NMR, with suggestions to explore temperature adjustments to clarify results.
chem_tr
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
608
Reaction score
3
Hello,

A friend of mine has synthesized a compound with pentafluorophenyl groups, and is willing to characterize it via an additional 19F-NMR. However, the person responsible for recording NMR spectra is inexperienced in 19F-NMR, so we need help on recording the spectra.

We have trifluoroacetic acid, hydrogen tetrafluoroborate, aqueous KF and aqueous HF in our laboratory. In my searches, I have found that trifluoroacetic acid is a good candidate as a reference material. How can we use the compound as a reference? Our NMR spectrometer does not require TMS for 1H and 13C NMR, for example. So the operator knows almost nothing about using a reference material and expects knowledge from us.

In the past, we attempted to record the spectra without a reference material, and the spectra contained peaks in the positive region, but literature suggests those values in the negative region. So we could not rely on the spectrum.

What do you suggest?

Thank you.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I have always used Varian NMRs, so this is how you would do it on a Varian instrument. I'm not sure how it would be different for Bruker instruments. By the way, it seems that the chemical shift for TFA differs quite a bit from solvent to solvent, so it might be best to use neat TFA for your reference material. More on that http://nmr.chem.indiana.edu/NMRguide/misc/19Fshifts.html .

To reference your spectra, first take a solution of your reference material (TFA is a common one, as you said) and take an F-19 spectrum of it. There should be a single peak at around -78 ppm. Click your cursor so it is close to the peak and then type 'nl' (without the quotes) and hit return. That should put your cursor on the center of the nearest peak. Once you have done that, set the reference by typing 'rl(-78.5p)' and hit return. At this point you are good to go with your other sample. Put the sample of the compound in the NMR and then once you collect the spectrum just report the peaks as they show up. You will need to re-reference your spectra to TFA each time you do this (unless you take multiple F19 spectra in one sitting, then it probably isn't necessary). This technique is called an "external reference" and isn't as accurate as internal referencing, but is safer for your compounds. When you report the data, make sure you state somewhere that the F19 chemical shifts are reported using TFA as an external reference standardized to -78.5 ppm.

A better way to reference your F19 is to use FCCl3, which is a commercial material. It's very inert, so you can add a small amount to your NMR sample and use it as an internal standard. Another convenient feature is that FCCl3 has a chemical shift of 0 in F19 NMR, so it is easy to set the reference line. Plus you only have to take one NMR spectrum. Also, FCCl3 is very low boiling (it's very nearly a gas at room temp.) so it is easy to recover your NMR sample in a pure form afterwards. TFA is not a good internal standard because it is very likely to react with your compound because of its high acidity.

When we ordered some FCCl3 to use as an internal standard we had to sign a couple of forms saying that we would dispose of it properly since it's a nasty green-house gas.

As an aside, all those fluorines will make the C13 spectrum look really wacky because of F19-C13 coupling. It won't look like regular proton-proton coupling either because F19 has a spin of 3/2. The first time I collected a C13 spectrum of a fluorinated compound I thought I had an impurity in there because there were so many peaks. It took me a while to figure out that they were all due to F19-C13 coupling. The coupling constants are usually really big as well (~200-300 Hz).

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This helped a lot, more than you'd imagine. Thank you.
 
help to identify peak -157.8 (m) in 19 F NMR, please!

chem_tr said:
Hello,

A friend of mine has synthesized a compound with pentafluorophenyl groups, and is willing to characterize it via an additional 19F-NMR. However, the person responsible for recording NMR spectra is inexperienced in 19F-NMR, so we need help on recording the spectra.

We have trifluoroacetic acid, hydrogen tetrafluoroborate, aqueous KF and aqueous HF in our laboratory. In my searches, I have found that trifluoroacetic acid is a good candidate as a reference material. How can we use the compound as a reference? Our NMR spectrometer does not require TMS for 1H and 13C NMR, for example. So the operator knows almost nothing about using a reference material and expects knowledge from us.

In the past, we attempted to record the spectra without a reference material, and the spectra contained peaks in the positive region, but literature suggests those values in the negative region. So we could not rely on the spectrum.

What do you suggest?

Thank you.

chem_tr said:
This helped a lot, more than you'd imagine. Thank you.

movies said:
I have always used Varian NMRs, so this is how you would do it on a Varian instrument. I'm not sure how it would be different for Bruker instruments. By the way, it seems that the chemical shift for TFA differs quite a bit from solvent to solvent, so it might be best to use neat TFA for your reference material. More on that http://nmr.chem.indiana.edu/NMRguide/misc/19Fshifts.html .

To reference your spectra, first take a solution of your reference material (TFA is a common one, as you said) and take an F-19 spectrum of it. There should be a single peak at around -78 ppm. Click your cursor so it is close to the peak and then type 'nl' (without the quotes) and hit return. That should put your cursor on the center of the nearest peak. Once you have done that, set the reference by typing 'rl(-78.5p)' and hit return. At this point you are good to go with your other sample. Put the sample of the compound in the NMR and then once you collect the spectrum just report the peaks as they show up. You will need to re-reference your spectra to TFA each time you do this (unless you take multiple F19 spectra in one sitting, then it probably isn't necessary). This technique is called an "external reference" and isn't as accurate as internal referencing, but is safer for your compounds. When you report the data, make sure you state somewhere that the F19 chemical shifts are reported using TFA as an external reference standardized to -78.5 ppm.

A better way to reference your F19 is to use FCCl3, which is a commercial material. It's very inert, so you can add a small amount to your NMR sample and use it as an internal standard. Another convenient feature is that FCCl3 has a chemical shift of 0 in F19 NMR, so it is easy to set the reference line. Plus you only have to take one NMR spectrum. Also, FCCl3 is very low boiling (it's very nearly a gas at room temp.) so it is easy to recover your NMR sample in a pure form afterwards. TFA is not a good internal standard because it is very likely to react with your compound because of its high acidity.

When we ordered some FCCl3 to use as an internal standard we had to sign a couple of forms saying that we would dispose of it properly since it's a nasty green-house gas.

As an aside, all those fluorines will make the C13 spectrum look really wacky because of F19-C13 coupling. It won't look like regular proton-proton coupling either because F19 has a spin of 3/2. The first time I collected a C13 spectrum of a fluorinated compound I thought I had an impurity in there because there were so many peaks. It took me a while to figure out that they were all due to F19-C13 coupling. The coupling constants are usually really big as well (~200-300 Hz).

Hope this helps.

help to identify peak -157.8 (m) in 19 F NMR, please!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello,

I am trying to do F-19 NMR. I always find two peaks which is supposed to be one. The proton NMR shows only one conformation. So my question is that what is the temperature you are working with? Is there any possibility that I lower the temperature to try? And also would it come from the coupling with proton?

Thank you very much!
 
movies said:
As an aside, all those fluorines will make the C13 spectrum look really wacky because of F19-C13 coupling. It won't look like regular proton-proton coupling either because F19 has a spin of 3/2. The first time I collected a C13 spectrum of a fluorinated compound I thought I had an impurity in there because there were so many peaks. It took me a while to figure out that they were all due to F19-C13 coupling. The coupling constants are usually really big as well (~200-300 Hz)


Are you sure? I always thought 19F had a spin of 1/2, just like 1H. I agree with the large J values, though.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...

Similar threads

Back
Top