1D Kinematics problem with a plane taking off

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving an Airbus 380's takeoff requirements on two different runways. The calculations show that the plane can successfully take off from the 3805-meter runway with a maximum acceleration of 0.95 m/s², achieving a necessary velocity of 85.05 m/s. However, for the 2400-meter runway, the plane only reaches 67.545 m/s, which is below the required 280 km/h. This raises questions about whether a plane must be able to use every runway at an airport to qualify for airport use. The problem allows for reasonable assumptions regarding acceleration and runway suitability, indicating a need for clarification on these points.
Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


An Airbus 380 needs to reach the velocity of 280 kmh^-1 before it takes off. The maximum acceleration the plain reaches in the runway is 0.95 ms^-2. Verify THAT the plane can use an airport with this runways.
Runway 1: 3805 meters (SSW-NNE)
Runway 2: 2400 meters (S-N)

Homework Equations


$$x=x_0+v_0 t + 1/2 a t^2 $$
$$ v= v_0 + at $$

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I thought this was a pretty easy problem.
Using equations of motion:
$$x=1/2 a t^2 $$
$$ v= at $$

For the first runway, solving
$$3805=1/2 \times 0.95 \times t^2$$
$$t=89.5 s$$

$$v= 0.95 \times 89.5 $$
$$v=85.05 ms^-1$$

Which confirms it can use this runway (since the velocity is bigger than the necessary velocity).

However for the second runway, I get

$$2400=1/2 \times 0.95 \times t^2$$
$$t=71.1 s$$

$$v= 0.95 \times 71.1 $$
$$v=67.545 ms^-1$$

Which is inferior to the necessary velocity. But that contradicts the problem statement that it can indeed use the airport.

I might be making an incorrect assumption. I suspect it might be related to the acceleration. In fact they say that's the maximum acceleration not the acceleration. So the might be a time dependence on the acceleration?
But how do I determine it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does a plane have to be able to use every runway at an airport in order for it to use that airport? The problem statement doesn't give any direct guidance on this matter, so I think that you are free to impose your own (reasonable) assumption. Just state up front in your answer what assumption you choose.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top