1st Order Diff. Equations - Need Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter travh2007
  • Start date Start date
travh2007
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Directions: Rewrite the following equation as a linear 1st Order Differential Equation in standard form. (Standard form = dy/dx + P(x)y = f(x))

dy/dx = xy(1+y3)

My problem is that there are too many y variables in this equation, and the standard form only has room for 1. So I figured I could write this in terms of x, since I only have one of them.


So..I tried to rewrite it by changing the (dy/dx) to (dx/dy) and then putting it in standard form.

So basically I changed the original equation to this:

dx/dy = xy(1+y3)

and then rearranged the equation to look like this:

dx/dy - (y+y3)x = 0

Is this the correct way of going about this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
travh2007 said:
Directions: Rewrite the following equation as a linear 1st Order Differential Equation in standard form. (Standard form = dy/dx + P(x)y = f(x))

dy/dx = xy(1+y3)

My problem is that there are too many y variables in this equation, and the standard form only has room for 1. So I figured I could write this in terms of x, since I only have one of them.


So..I tried to rewrite it by changing the (dy/dx) to (dx/dy) and then putting it in standard form.

So basically I changed the original equation to this:

dx/dy = xy(1+y3)
The step above isn't valid.

If dy/dx = xy(1 + y3), then dx/dy = 1/[ xy(1 + y3)]
travh2007 said:
and then rearranged the equation to look like this:

dx/dy - (y+y3)x = 0

Is this the correct way of going about this problem?

I don't see any way of writing dy/dx = xy(1 + y3) as dy/dx + P(x)y = f(x).

If you know the technique of separation of variables, the DE can be solved that way.
 
What Mark said. But also: my first instinct is re read the instructions: "rewrite as a *linear* ode in standard form." Your current equation is certainly not linear in y; however, I believe it is Bernoulli, which means it can be converted to a linear ODE. But I am on the train; so I could be mistaken.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top